The charts below show the Internet use in different purposes in Australia in 2010,2011 and the percentage by users.
The bar chart above illustrates the usage of the Internet in Australia for various purposes in the period between 2010 and 2011 as well as the percentage of users for each purpose mentioned.
At the first glance, the highest percentage of Australian usage belonged to emailings meanwhile the lowest were paying bills online and social media, as well as sharing the same percentage of user’s age.
Looking in closer detail, about 70 percent of individuals surfed the Internet with the intention of contacting emails, the highest proportion compared to the others. Equally showing lower statistics, social media and online-bill payments were less popular purposes, which made up about 49 percent and 50 percent relatively.
Comparing between different age groups, with approximately 80 percent of individuals , Australians who were 65 above used the Internet with the view of sending emails and paying bills through online platforms meanwhile this range of age offered the least important contribution in social media, at around 30%. In contrast, youngsters at the age of 18 to 25 were likely to surf social media which was obviously the vast majority with nearly 100%. However, this group possessed the lowest users in emailings and online payments, at 60%, which was comparatively lower than 20 percent owing to the highest groups.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | sandranguyenanh04 | 84 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 167, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...hest proportion compared to the others. Equally showing lower statistics, social media ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 85, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... approximately 80 percent of individuals , Australians who were 65 above used the ...
^^
Line 7, column 372, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rs at the age of 18 to 25 were likely to surf social media which was obviously th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, so, well, while, in contrast, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.48453608247 80% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1132.0 937.175257732 121% => OK
No of words: 212.0 206.0 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33962264151 4.54256449028 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.78020617076 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7354499476 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575471698113 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 336.6 290.88556701 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 16.3608247423 183% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1055936944 44.8134815571 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 161.714285714 76.5299724578 211% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 30.2857142857 16.8248392259 180% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1428571429 4.34317383033 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195947035739 0.216113520407 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090368271766 0.0766984524023 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115000395359 0.0603063233224 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140882543367 0.12726935374 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.129617522397 0.0580467560999 223% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 8.37731958763 226% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 41.03 70.7449484536 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 7.45979381443 201% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 8.71597938144 164% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 8.62886597938 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 8.54432989691 164% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.