The diagram below show the velopment of cutting tools in the Stone Age.
Summarize the information st cting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
You should write at least 150 words.
The diagram compares the differences between the evolution of cutting tools A with cutting tools B during the Stone Age, which was in 1.4 million and 0.8 million years ago.
It is noticable that the cutting tool A had the same shapes which was tall, thin in the side view and darker compare with tool B which was bigger and oval shape. However, they also had a same height which is just around 10cm.
The front and the back view of them are sigfinically different. While the tool A was thinner and mountain-like, the tool B was more oval and sharpened in the top. Besides, the side view of tool A was bigger than another.
In conclusion, due to the purpose of people who living during the Stone Age, the differences between their weapons were. There is a point that, the cutting tool B was sharpened with some aspects, not as crude as the cutting tool A.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-09 | nguyenngothuyduong | 73 | view |
- The diagram below show the velopment of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information st cting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should write at least 150 words 73
- Writing task 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Nowadays sports is a big business with high earnings for professional sports people and companies involved both financially and other ways Is this a positive or 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, however, if, so, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.48453608247 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 18.0 26.3917525773 68% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 701.0 937.175257732 75% => OK
No of words: 157.0 206.0 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.46496815287 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53976893118 3.78020617076 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.36805658624 2.54303337028 93% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 127.690721649 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.522292993631 0.622605031667 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 290.88556701 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.41237113402 92% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 16.3608247423 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4638396678 44.8134815571 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.625 76.5299724578 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.625 16.8248392259 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 4.34317383033 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130400834387 0.216113520407 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608722083486 0.0766984524023 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0525152439522 0.0603063233224 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0962158640026 0.12726935374 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0504440945902 0.0580467560999 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 8.37731958763 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 70.7449484536 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.59 8.71597938144 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.79 7.59969072165 89% => OK
difficult_words: 22.0 41.2886597938 53% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 8.54432989691 112% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 8.15463917526 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.