Green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of antioxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune-system boosting compounds. Many people therefore believe that the more cups they consume each day, the greater the benefits. Green tea, however, contains moderate amounts of caffeine, a stimulant that is not without side effects, including sleeplessness, irritability, and headaches. A long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those that chronic coffee drinkers, another source of caffeine, suffer. Therefore, it is important that anyone who chooses to drink green tea limit their intake to no more than two cups a day.
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
The author concludes that it is important to limit consumption of the green tea to not more than two cups. This argument, however, is predicated on flawed assumptions which author fails to support with provident information. In order to properly evaluate the author's remarks on the observation made, more evidences are essential.
Citing the information, the author reports that green tea has long been hailed as an excellent source of anti-oxidants, powerful anti-aging and immune system boosting compounds. This information, however, has no evident base to support its content and claim. Perhaps, if the author had provided the citation from a scientific study or experimentation revealing the information about the compounds present in the green tea, the author's citation would be supportive to the argument. Also, the data would contain more substantiality if author provided examples with sample data where green tea served as immune system boosting compound in people consuming it. Therefore, without effective supporting statements the author's claim stands with less validity.
Moreover, the author also mentions that green tea also contains moderate amounts of caffeine and with side effects. However, as deduced in the previous paragraph, there is no supporting structure for the statement, there is no evidence as to what amount of green tea subsumes caffeine. How were the side effects such as sleeplessness, irritability and headaches were observed? Perhaps, a survey or statistical data containing information about the number of people experiencing side effects with consumption of green tea, with more number of people suffering these side effects would strengthen the author's position with the argument. Hence, without valid supporting information, the author's argument cannot be properly evaluated.
Additionally, The author's implies that long-term study has found that those who drink more than three cups of green tea a day are likely to have symptoms similar to those of chronic coffee drinkers. The author again provides no information regarding the symptoms of chronic coffee drinkers. Are the constituents in both green tea and chronic coffee similar to each other and in same quantity? What number of people according the long-term study drank more cups of green tea? There is no proper figure and total figure to establish a link with the long-term study indicating the symptoms being similar to that of chronic coffee drinkers. Therefore, the author's argument rests solely on flawed assumptions and is insufficiently supported by the passage to evaluate the argument.
While, the author's conclusion may be true, but it lacks several considerations and predicates on flawed assumptions. However, with the evidences provided, as discussed in the previous paragraphs, the author's argument can be evaluated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-19 | jayauen | 70 | view |
| 2022-07-07 | sag15 | 53 | view |
| 2022-04-09 | harvey_elliot | 62 | view |
| 2021-09-27 | Bolaji | 45 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | megha tomar | 73 | view |
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a large highly diversified company Ten years ago our company had two new office buildings constructed as regional headquarters for two regions The buildings were erected by different construction c 62
- Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and s 54
- Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree Be 66
- The following appeared in a letter to the editor of the Balmer Island Gazette On Balmer Island where mopeds serve as a popular form of transportation the population increases to 100 000 during the summer months To reduce the number of accidents involving 68
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 83
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 2 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 6 2
No. of Sentences: 21 15
No. of Words: 433 350
No. of Characters: 2354 1500
No. of Different Words: 200 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.562 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.436 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.86 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 189 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 150 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 118 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 67 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20.619 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.792 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.619 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.357 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.549 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.097 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 428, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...compounds present in the green tea, the authors citation would be supportive to the arg...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 685, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...thout valid supporting information, the authors argument cannot be properly evaluated. ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 653, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...chronic coffee drinkers. Therefore, the authors argument rests solely on flawed assumpt...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 12, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...to evaluate the argument. While, the authors conclusion may be true, but it lacks se...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...scussed in the previous paragraphs, the authors argument can be evaluated.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, may, moreover, regarding, so, then, therefore, while, as to, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.9520958084 46% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 11.1786427146 107% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 13.6137724551 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 28.8173652695 52% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 23.0 16.3942115768 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2409.0 2260.96107784 107% => OK
No of words: 433.0 441.139720559 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.56351039261 5.12650576532 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.56307096286 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94990686538 2.78398813304 106% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480369515012 0.468620217663 103% => OK
syllable_count: 733.5 705.55239521 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59920159681 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.96107784431 40% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.76447105788 137% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.70958083832 111% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.22255489022 118% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 19.7664670659 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.8473053892 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2489293526 57.8364921388 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.714285714 119.503703932 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 23.324526521 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.70786347227 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.25449101796 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.20758483034 73% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 6.88822355289 160% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.67664670659 86% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260343285162 0.218282227539 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0874806057737 0.0743258471296 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111411768931 0.0701772020484 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139131241756 0.128457276422 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101395505449 0.0628817314937 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 14.3799401198 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.3550499002 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.197005988 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.5979740519 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32208582834 105% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 98.500998004 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 12.3882235529 69% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.1389221557 90% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.9071856287 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.