Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
It is more important for governments to spend money to improve Internet access than to improve public transportation.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
As countries and technology continue to develop, the doubts about importance of internet and its vital role in modern life, wane. Personally, I can hardly imagine a daily ordinary life without the internet, thus I am of this opinion that the government must raise internet quality and access everywhere. I feel this way for some reasons, which I will explore in the following essay.
To begin with, enhancing public transportation in cities was an old assignment of the governments. Nowadays, most of the developed cities have a sophisticated and long metro lines, which has eased people mobility in the cities a lot easier. As a result, I believe most of the countries developed enough in that area and though new investment on this matter would bring no harm, it is not the priority. New subject that must be solved by governments is the new world needs. Technology developpes in a mesmerizing pace these days and falling behind this speed would cause severe problems for countries. Plus most of these technologies lies on the internet, therefore enhancing the internet is a requisite to catch up with the modern world.
furthermore, it's roughly about two decades that the internet was firstly introduced and spread everywhere. Undoubtedly, a new and essential subject like this have a long way to be fully developed and reaching its climax. All these progress require academic studies and researches in this field. As a result, it would be up to government to procure this huge investment on related researches. In addition, all this investments would come back with great profit , if these researches reach their targets. Satellite internet provided by Starlink company is a compelling example of this. By providing access to the internet using satellites communication, a wide range of areas on earth would have internet and almost no blind points would be left. Had not been this company investment on broad researches on this, this success would have never been accomplished. Thus usually investments on this areas would reaches their goal and give the countries upper hand in this modern era.
In conclusion, I believe countries should prioritize their targets and meeting contemporary demands of each era must be on top of that list. At this time we live, there is nothing more valuable and important than internet and it's a privilege for countries if they reach great improvements on that.
- Imagine that you are in a classroom or a meeting The teacher or the meeting leader says something incorrect In your opinion which of the following is the best thing to do Interrupt and correct the mistake right away Wait until the class or meeting is over 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is better to live in one town or city all your life than to move from one place to another Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Sometimes it is better to be dishonest Use specific reasons and details to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Because the world is changing so quickly people now are less happy or less satisfied with their lives than people were in the past Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 71
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The opinions of celebrities such as famous entertainers and athletes are more important to younger people than they are to older people Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Furthermore
...ite to catch up with the modern world. furthermore, its roughly about two decades that the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...up with the modern world. furthermore, its roughly about two decades that the inte...
^^^
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...on related researches. In addition, all this investments would come back with great ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...tments would come back with great profit , if these researches reach their targets...
^^
Line 3, column 861, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ess would have never been accomplished. Thus usually investments on this areas would...
^^^^
Line 3, column 889, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...complished. Thus usually investments on this areas would reaches their goal and give...
^^^^
Line 3, column 906, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'would' requires the base form of the verb: 'reach'
Suggestion: reach
...usually investments on this areas would reaches their goal and give the countries upper...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 226, Rule ID: IT_IS[17]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...aluable and important than internet and its a privilege for countries if they reach...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, so, therefore, thus, i feel, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, to begin with, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 15.1003584229 93% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 9.8082437276 143% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 42.0 43.0788530466 97% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 52.1666666667 94% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2007.0 1977.66487455 101% => OK
No of words: 395.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08101265823 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45809453852 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85945461867 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 212.727598566 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544303797468 0.524837075471 104% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.59856630824 83% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.86738351254 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6003584229 97% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0237822401 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.35 100.406767564 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.45110844103 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.5376344086 144% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 11.8709677419 101% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124823401277 0.236089414692 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0418077818179 0.076458572812 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446196936354 0.0737576698707 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903555522325 0.150856017488 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284999338232 0.0645574589148 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 11.7677419355 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 58.1214874552 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.01818996416 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 86.8835125448 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 10.002688172 115% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.247311828 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.