Discussing controversial topics with those with contrasting views is not useful because very few people change their mind when questioned about their core beliefs.
Write a response to the prompt in which you discuss whether or not you agree or disagree. Be certain to fully develop your position and carefully consider ways in which your position could be challenged.
Controversial topics highly rely on distinctive opinions of an individual. While having debates amongst our peers, there is always a clash between different approaches and beliefs of one another. In my opinion, I agree that conversing on controversial subjects gives no proper conclusion as majority of humans tend to stick to their own beliefs.
From our childhood to the very end, our core values are inclucated based on our upbringing. We spend our early years with our friends and family members in a custom environment and follow certain rules and traditions that stay with us for the rest of our lives. For example, People from Asian countries go on voyage to various other countries and yet follow their customs and traditions. They celebrate their festivals according to their mythology and follow what was been taught to them from the very beginning. Just because they acknowledge other ways of living, see and listen to the various 'contrasting views', it is not necessary that they will change their core values and beliefs.
Controversial topics end exactly where they start. The issue stays exactly where it was at the beginning but the only difference is that the people conversing the problem are affected. For instance, while fighting for a ban on wearing a hijab, the members of the parliament having different core belief constantly argue with each other and the outcome of the controversy never gets resolved. If obligated certain repurcussions will affect the society.
In the end, delicate topics leading to arguments due to the contrasting views is of no use. It is very less likely that a person would change his or her mindset while resolving a controversy. Every individual has the their own right towards their core values and beliefs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 464, Rule ID: WAS_BEEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'was' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: was; has been
...ding to their mythology and follow what was been taught to them from the very beginning....
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 392, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of the controversy never gets resolved. If obligated certain repurcussions will af...
^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'their'?
Suggestion: the; their
...ing a controversy. Every individual has the their own right towards their core values and...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, for example, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1473.0 2235.4752809 66% => OK
No of words: 290.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07931034483 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73924445175 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 215.323595506 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.58275862069 0.4932671777 118% => OK
syllable_count: 449.1 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.1846680612 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 23.4991977007 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213902483327 0.243740707755 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0671272656665 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368011927685 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124924745574 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0353735330756 0.0667264976115 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.