Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
There is a controversial debate whether highschool learners should be allowed to remake feedback or even evaluate their lecturers. While some people consider it a tactic to enhance educational quality, the others go for the statement that it will act as a disturbance in students’ admiration together with castigation. In my opinion, I partially agree with the latter statement.
Apparently, receiving comments from students can bring a wealth of advantageous impacts on both their learning and instructors’ teaching. Without a shadow of a doubt, by the learning process, pupils could have various thoughts about the teaching methods so with a view to make educational quality improvement, they can give feedback to their instructors. Hence, it is a great opportunity for teachers to raise awareness and insight about theru current strengths and weaknesses. For instance, in every Vietnamese high school, there is a long tradition that students will be given a piece of paper to carefully note down their comments about all of the teachers for lecturers to grasp whether their lesson plans are proper or they need to adjust in order to facilitate the learning journey of prospective young scholars. Due to these redeeming features, it is irrefutable to note down that giving comments do wonders for both students and instructors.
On the other hand, although the merits of giving feedback are widely acknowledged, there is still a wide range of appraisal tactics that do not cause great harm to students' discipline and reverence to their lecturers. Obviously, every learner is entitled to voice their own requirements but they should use open discussion, which acts as a precursor to both parties to find a viable solution when any urgent issue comes up. For example, they can elegantly express their own comments and opinions to avoid misbehaving in a study environment. Hence, with a view to maintaining respect and discipline, students should gracefully discuss when giving feedback instead of criticizing their teachers.
In conclusion, although giving comments can bring a steady stream of upsides to both students’ learning and instructors’ teaching, learners should only use tactful discussion to avoid leading to loss of respect and discipline.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 641, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...arefully note down their comments about all of the teachers for lecturers to grasp whether...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, hence, so, still, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 1.00243902439 1197% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 24.0 5.60731707317 428% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1915.0 965.302439024 198% => OK
No of words: 355.0 196.424390244 181% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39436619718 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 3.73543355544 116% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02936235903 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 106.607317073 189% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.569014084507 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 570.6 283.868780488 201% => syllable counts are too long.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.1304005514 43.030603864 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.307692308 112.824112599 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3076923077 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92307692308 5.23603664747 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 3.70975609756 297% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.09268292683 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267597616283 0.215688989381 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857884947822 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048357229639 0.0843802449381 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150295485979 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.029592778873 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.2329268293 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 61.2550243902 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.3012195122 134% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.28 11.4140731707 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.06136585366 120% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 40.7170731707 258% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.