The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Given are two maps contrasting the modifications of an island over a course of time to serve region’s visitors.
Perceptibly, the area has been developed into a well-facilities tourist destination with the addition of various amenities without replacing its original nature landscape.
In terms of the former area, it was a pristine island with some trees in the west and the east of the region. Additionally, there was a beach to the left-hand side.
It is noticeable from the second illustration that ten accommodations have been built in the heart of the island, and six others located in further west of the paradise island, to the right-hand of the beach which is used for swimming. Each bungalow is connected with each other by footpath, and visitors could go to the beach from cottages by the same way. In the middle of two groups of accommodations, a reception has been constructed, which is surrounded by vehicle track leading to the restaurant in the north and a pier in the south of the island.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 84 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | nvtrung309 | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-05 | Hồ Phi Long | 10 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 78
- Although there is a lot of translation software available learning a language could still be advantageous To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The map shows how coastal land develops into a coastal park 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 32.9175257732 12% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 26.3917525773 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 841.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88953488372 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05450641914 2.54303337028 120% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.598837209302 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.583332081 44.8134815571 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.142857143 76.5299724578 157% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5714285714 16.8248392259 146% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.85714285714 4.34317383033 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.94845360825 127% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.102839880622 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0453471287436 0.0766984524023 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0382490687753 0.0603063233224 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0654119726976 0.12726935374 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326271168959 0.0580467560999 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 8.71597938144 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 41.2886597938 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 8.62886597938 139% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.