Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past. Why is that so? Does the development
have more advantages.
Modern lifestyle differs from those of the past in many ways. The development of social media network and preferences for familiarity have led to the transformation of written language to a more information. This essay will examine both sides of the argument before conclusion is drawn.
Admittedly, there are some argument in favor of people use written language in a less formal way. First, the informality of written language today can be attributed to a number of factors, and technological and social media are believed support people about words regardless of their family background. This social media, support, presumably, tends not only to increase communication by technology of modern people but also mitigate their formal written language because they are always used simple words to texting for others, and this is just a message to get acquainted, work, make friends, so they not use formal words but prefer to use simple words to get close. Second, writing something that will only be read by small group of people is less likely to require substantial effort and time, which eventually promotes an comfortable and friendly society. In fact, it is acknowledged that skilled and communication human capital is imperative to foster economic growth and technological development in any nations.
Nevertheless, the resultant problem would be far more significant than the minor benefits once people use written language in a less formal way. First, all people used simple way would likely correspond with a standard vocabulary and communication skills. Nowadays,by using technology devices such as mobile phone or tablets, people can keep in touch with their family or their friends, so they don’t know formal words with other people. Furthermore, with today’s society, I realize that almost all young call themselves equal and have no respect for the opposite person, people could become over-reliant on the Internet, meaning that home country vocabulary will be limited and not expandable. Second, all people written language in a less formal way would make people working about writing essay or work email for their company can’t use right words and bad words in writing and for a job application with a superior, thereby adding great burdens for company admissions and enrollment staff and potentially wasting time that these young people could have spent pursuing more vocabulary suitable.
I was discussed both sides of the argument. In my perspective, this argument have disadvantages outweigh advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-19 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
- The diagram below shows how a modern landfill for household waste is designed Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Studies imply many teen these days fancy socializing online to meeting one another in person I think because they don t have much time to meet outside so they prefer to meet outside so they prefer to meet online 56
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 56
- Some people think that the government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problem Give your option 63
- The increasing use of computers and mobile phones has had a negative effect on young people s reading and writing skills Agree Disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 823, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
...ort and time, which eventually promotes an comfortable and friendly society. In fa...
^^
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , by
...ulary and communication skills. Nowadays,by using technology devices such as mobile...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, nevertheless, second, so, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 10.4138276553 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1615.20841683 132% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36432160804 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8507491627 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540201005025 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 668.7 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 102.715702575 49.4020404114 208% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 142.333333333 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.5333333333 20.7667163134 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.13333333333 7.06120827912 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.338609204924 0.244688304435 138% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117200894728 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108933004795 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173786390439 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0933275484286 0.056905535591 164% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.