The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017.
The line graph shows the mean daily expenditure by international travellers for three different purposes in New Zealand between 1997 and 2017.
It is clear that the expenses for three various purposes jumped between 1997 and 2004, and dropped in the following years. However, the number of expenditures for different purposes varied, especially from 1997 to 2004, while between 2005 and 2017, the costs for business and holidays gradually became even higher than for visiting friends and relatives.
In 1997, the costs for business, holidays and visiting friends and relatives were about 260, 190 and 120 dollars respectively. They soon surged to approximately 90 dollars and peaked at 330, 270, and 220 dollars separately in 2004. Nevertheless, all three lines saw a dramatic drop in the following three years and remained virtually unchanged till 2017.
Later on, the daily expenses for business and holidays stood relatively still, ranging from 180 dollars to 240 dollars, whereas the daily expenditure for visiting friends and relatives kept falling until 2011 and levelled off at about 130 dollars. However, the cost for business witnessed a radical change between 2014 and 2015, dropping steeply at first and then climbing dramatically to 260 dollars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-31 | maerd z | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-31 | maerd z | 11 | view |
| 2021-08-16 | chuquynhanh03 | 100 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | thuthao12344214 | view | |
| 2019-01-29 | DiemLinh | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 89
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- The graph below shows the average daily spend of three categories of international visitor to New Zealand from 1997 to 2017 11
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportion of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 6.8 250% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1069.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39898989899 4.92477711251 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67265264026 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.60101010101 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0335824722 43.030603864 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.625 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.75 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.125 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179947222514 0.215688989381 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0941142941229 0.103423049105 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119327177008 0.0843802449381 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153877524656 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.140539355063 0.0819641961636 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.