some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some infomation is too important or too valueable to be shared freely

Essay topics:

some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some infomation is too important or too valueable to be shared freely.

In recent days, it is opined that the public share of information, especially in scientific research, trade and the academic world as many as possible confers ample profits, whilst other individuals hold the belief that there is a great deal of information which is too preponderant or too worthwhile to be disseminated without any fees. From my point of view, I partly consent to the second opinion and both notions will be thoroughly delineated in this essay.

On the one hand, free information sharing in scientific researches, business and academic discipline is significantly beneficial. As the foremost, it renders all individuals a chance to access a huge reservoir of up-to-date and precious data and new breakthroughs. They could accumulate some experiences which are on the agenda for their assignments through the findings of other people. An epitome is that if a scientist disseminates information about his working process, other people could gain a profound understanding of his inventing process. Besides that, free information can enhance the quality of work of individuals. It is evident that those reliable findings are a great source of knowledge which could be made use of in their study.

On the other hand, there are some noticeable demerits when charging a fee is not compulsory. To begin with, financial perquisite obviously acts as an incentive for a large pool of people to continue their work. The working process obviously requires both a long period of time and a huge budget allocation. Accordingly, they could gain money from the copyright if it is available. In addition, there is some information which must not be shared or leaked. There could be a correlation between those private data with the long-term development of a company or sometimes even the mortality of humans. One glaring example is that the design of atomic bomb must not be leaked otherwise the stability of the whole society would be demolished. Furthermore, paying fee is a way of paying respect to the contribution of the creators. They have allocated a great deal of time for experimenting and finding or creating handy things. As a result, they should be appreciated for their efforts with financial incentives.

As aforementioned reasons matter, paying a fee for date in scientific area, trade and academic field is of critical importance for the sake of scientists, businessmen, and education-makers. Nonetheless, there could be a relative dissemination of information between individuals to an extent in terms of mutual privileges.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-06-10 bassmodulators123 84 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 56 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 67 view
2024-02-22 Ahmad_off 73 view
2024-02-06 MinyiChu 89 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
... process obviously requires both a long period of time and a huge budget allocation. According...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, besides, but, furthermore, if, nonetheless, second, so, while, in addition, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 13.1623246493 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2146.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 408.0 315.596192385 129% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25980392157 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49433085973 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18165200138 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 220.0 176.041082164 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.539215686275 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.7669798386 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 8.67935871743 184% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23119371128 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0616297295449 0.084324248473 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758710613854 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140280452513 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537945146703 0.056905535591 95% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.27 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 78.4519038076 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.