The use of social media is replacing face-to-face interaction among many people in society. Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Some individuals believe that real interaction has been superseded by social networking sites. From my perspective, while there are various apparent demerits, I would argue that these are eclipsed by advantages.
On the one hand, there is no question that this tendency has brought with it a variety of negative impacts. Initially, youngsters who are addicted to social media spend too much time keeping their eyes glued to a screen, leading to increasingly sedentary lifestyles. As a result, they are prone to obesity, carrying severe health risks including life-threatening conditions such as cancer and cardiovascular diseases. Furthermore, due to the advances in technology, individuals can access the internet easily. However, millions of internet users have become victims of many dangerous computer hackers and online scams, which renders people to tackle considerable issues and unpleasant experiences related to information infringement.
On the other hand, I still believe that this phenomenon has more tremendous positives. The first beneficial aspect is that this tendency can facilitate social connections. In this day and age, people are scattered around the world for work or studies. Thus, virtual platforms serve as excellent tools for keeping in touch with family and friends. This alleviates a sense of alienation and eases negative moods, which aids to avoid mental health problems such as depression. Another significant advantage is that customers have much more convenience when ordering online. Since cyberspace is an enormous source to look for information, consumers might have enough time and opportunity to read carefully feedback and compare product features of different brands. Consequently, they are not swayed by advertisements and do not buy goods compulsively, hence satisfaction.
In conclusion, it seems to me that despite a few drawbacks, the merits of this situation are much more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 56 | view |
| 2024-02-07 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
| 2023-09-05 | Phuong1810 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-31 | myhuyenueh94 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-07 | nhinhan | 67 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that these are eclipsed by advantages. On the one hand, there is no question th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68041237113 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13151388868 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.572520453 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751289919297 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211497973381 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257999631364 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038106095264 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222975183798 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 213, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... that these are eclipsed by advantages. On the one hand, there is no question th...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, furthermore, hence, however, if, look, so, still, thus, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1653.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.68041237113 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13151388868 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680412371134 0.561755894193 121% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.572520453 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.3125 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.625 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0751289919297 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0211497973381 0.084324248473 25% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0257999631364 0.0667982634062 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.038106095264 0.151304729494 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0222975183798 0.056905535591 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.