Some people object to government spending taxpayers’ money on the arts, such as paintings and sculptures in public places, because they believe there are higher priorities for public spending. What’s your opinion?
Some people have argued that government should not allocate money for arts in public locations. From my perspective, I take a dim view of it on the basis of the following reasons.
In the first place, arts have a positive influence on individuals, especially entertainment and a sense of pride. State budgets should not only be used for erecting hospitals or schools, but also for art galleries as well on the grounds that residents require some places to alleviate stress. Supposing that there is no existence of arts in life, people will live in monotony. As a consequence, the government has to provide financial support for establishing more and more places for paintings or sculptures. This might facilitate the mental life of people a lot. The additional point is that government funding for arts make humans themselves proud due to the fact that there are a multitude of works of art that provide memorials, namely statues of leaders, soldiers, or scientists.
The second point to take into consideration is that offering financial assistance to arts means an economic investment. A good many kinds of arts are the identity of one country; accordingly, numerous tourists may come to enjoy, which boosts the economic potential. This is illustrated by the fact that Vietnam is well-known for ceramics and pottery. The ideal place to have a glimpse of the country’s rich ceramic art form is Bat Trang Ceramic Village. The other option is that visitors might go to Hoi An’s Ancient Town to experience the beauty of ceramic products. As a result, spending money on arts is not a waste of the budget, but extensive revenues for the government.
To recapitulate, the promotion of works of art is as much a priority as any other, so it is understandable for government to give money to the arts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-11-08 | Trần Ngọc Bảo Khanh | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | Trần Ngọc Bảo Khanh | 61 | view |
- Some people object to government spending taxpayers money on the arts such as paintings and sculptures in public places because they believe there are higher priorities for public spending What s your opinion 61
- Some people object to government spending taxpayers money on the arts such as paintings and sculptures in public places because they believe there are higher priorities for public spending What s your opinion 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, if, may, second, so, well, as to, as a result, in the first place
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93421052632 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93875032328 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565789473684 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 475.2 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3178482671 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2666666667 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261722372892 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829891808505 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753098017446 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15954272616 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0377951774371 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.