The table gives information on consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002.
The table data represents how much was spent on different types of consumption in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in the year 2002. Overall, the consumers in all five of the nations have a tendency to consume more money on food, drinks and tobacco than on clothing and footwear, which was subsequently followed by leisure and education.
It can be seen that Turkey, Ireland and Spain account for the highest percentage of their national expenditure on food, drink and tobacco, 32.14%, 28.91%, and 18.80%, respectively. Furthermore, the population of these nations spent between 5% and 9% on clothing and footwear, with Italians spending the most 9%.
On the other hand, it's noteworthy to note that in these nations, leisure and education expenses are substantially lower than those for the other two categories. Spanish people spent the least at 1.98% and Turkish people the highest at 4.35% on education and entertainment. According to the provided data, none of the five nations spent more than 5% on leisure and education.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-04 | hananguyen | 78 | view |
| 2022-07-18 | Blackcytrus | view | |
| 2022-01-19 | Hoang chang | 61 | view |
| 2021-09-12 | ryshad | 73 | view |
| 2021-03-30 | Mirfayzbek | 56 | view |
- In many countries plastic containers have become more popular than ever They are used in many businesses such as the food and drink industry Do you think the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 61
- The tables give information about sales of Fairtrade labeled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 78
- Some people think that more money should be spent on protecting endangered species while others think it is a waste of valuable money What is your opinion 61
- Some people say that modern technology has made shopping today easier while others disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The table gives information on consumers spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 5.05154639175 257% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 32.9175257732 24% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 870.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 169.0 206.0 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14792899408 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78294032208 2.54303337028 109% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 255.6 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 3.0 0.824742268041 364% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 34.3422153494 44.8134815571 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.285714286 76.5299724578 162% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 16.8248392259 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 4.34317383033 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.113578614244 0.216113520407 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490069528001 0.0766984524023 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562672561085 0.0603063233224 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0771375539829 0.12726935374 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787704009707 0.0580467560999 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 8.37731958763 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 7.59969072165 116% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 41.2886597938 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.