The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France, Spain, Germany, Turkey between 1970 and 2010
The line graph illustrates the amount of fruit production in 4 countries such as France, Spain, Germany, Turkey between 1970 and 2010
Overall, it can be seen that the amount of fruit producted in Spain ranked the first place. In addtion fruit production in France and Turkey icreased. In contract the fruit production in Germany were continously decreasing.
In initial impression from the graph is that about 5.5 million tonnes of fruit were producted in Spain in 1970 compared 3,5 million tonnnes in Germany. And in 1980 the amount of fruit production in Spain had increased sharply and peaked at more than 6 millions of tonnes before it decresased by the end of 2010 to more than 5 millions tonnes. Whereas the amount of fruit were 2,5 milions toones of fruit in Germany however it had dropped dramatically to 1,5 millions tonnes in 1990 which was stable for 10 years before it fell sightly at the end of the period 1,2 millions of tonnes.
In 1970 the figure was provied with more than 1,2 tons of fruit produced in France and is the country with the lowest of the 4 producing countries. In the following years, fruit yield in France grew to reach 2,5 million tonnes in 2010. The amount of fruit producted in Turkey saw a increased of 1,5 millions toones in 2000 and rising to 3,5 million at the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Giang Tran | 67 | view |
- The charts show the main methods of transport of people travelling to one university in 2004 and 2009 Summarise the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the changes in a town after the construction of a hydroelectric power dam Write at least 150 words 73
- MAURITIAN TEENAGERS IN THEIR MAIN DIET 78
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant. 56
- The given line graph illustrates clients average every year spending on mobile phone national and international land line and services 67
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, Germany, Turkey between 1970 and 2010 Overall, it can be seen that the amount ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n Germany were continously decreasing. In initial impression from the graph is th...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...creased sharply and peaked at more than 6 millions of tonnes before it decresased by the end ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...fell sightly at the end of the period 1,2 millions of tonnes. In 1970 the figure was provied...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...amount of fruit producted in Turkey saw a increased of 1,5 millions toones in 200...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65236051502 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45036941407 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7341972582 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474343984318 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214862516913 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154626035666 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382753939619 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.227166344005 0.0819641961636 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 134, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n, Germany, Turkey between 1970 and 2010 Overall, it can be seen that the amount ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...n Germany were continously decreasing. In initial impression from the graph is th...
^^
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '6 million'.
Suggestion: 6 million
...creased sharply and peaked at more than 6 millions of tonnes before it decresased by the end ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 562, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '2 million'.
Suggestion: 2 million
...fell sightly at the end of the period 1,2 millions of tonnes. In 1970 the figure was provied...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 280, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...amount of fruit producted in Turkey saw a increased of 1,5 millions toones in 200...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, whereas, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1084.0 965.302439024 112% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65236051502 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45036941407 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.467811158798 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 298.8 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7341972582 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.444444444 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.474343984318 0.215688989381 220% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.214862516913 0.103423049105 208% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.154626035666 0.0843802449381 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.382753939619 0.15604864568 245% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.227166344005 0.0819641961636 277% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.45 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.