Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
Museums are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. Although the fact that they represent each society's culture, they can show the nation's history. We can count on them as reliable sources for data gathering. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country or not. Some people possess the conviction that there are many ways to learn about a country's journey, whereas I think visiting museums is a fruitful way to get knowledge of a country. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most important reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that there are different museums that belong to different parts of the nation, including the sports, arts, transportation industry, and agriculture industries. When foreign people come to our country and visit these places, they can see the sequences of changes and familiar with our history. Consider my experience to make this point more clear. When I traveled to Brussels, I went to their museums and I could get a lot of information about their history. I specifically, went to their transportation industry museum and clearly could see how their airplane industry changed over time and they got improved.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that people when go to museums, there are always leaders or descriptions of each part that they can ask questions about and get information and improve their knowledge about those specific areas. In some countries, the government spends more budget on improving the quality of museums; because they found the benefits of museums. In particular, some museums use last technology for easy understanding. Consider the new camp Barcelona sports museums. In this museum, we can see the history of each player and there are speakers who read their destiny aloud and present on a big projector. Thus people can easily see them and get more information.
In brief, due to the aforemetioned reasons, I think visiting museums is the best way to learn more about a country based on their visitor's attractions and history collections. It is anticipated that if we want to get all information about a nation and country's history, we can visit its museums and complete our understanding of those countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 90 | view |
| 2023-01-10 | saba22 | 70 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | usef | 71 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | m_aalaei | 66 | view |
- Summarize the points made in the lecture being sure to explain how they cast doubt on the specific solutions proposed in the reading passage 70
- In order to attract more tourists the government could either improve safety by hiring more police or improve its appearance by repairing old buildings and streets Which way do you think is more effective 80
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The most important things people learn are from families 70
- It is more important to read or watch news presented by people whose views are different from your own than it is to read or watch news presented by those whose views are similar to your own 73
- The best way to truly relax and reduce stress is to spend time alone 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 152, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'nations'' or 'nation's'?
Suggestion: nations'; nation's
...ach societys culture, they can show the nations history. We can count on them as reliab...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, thus, whereas, i think, in brief, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 15.1003584229 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 9.8082437276 92% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 13.8261648746 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.0286738351 109% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 43.0788530466 111% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 52.1666666667 92% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2016.0 1977.66487455 102% => OK
No of words: 396.0 407.700716846 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 4.8611393121 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46091344257 4.48103885553 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8384737036 2.67179642975 106% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 212.727598566 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.510101010101 0.524837075471 97% => OK
syllable_count: 608.4 618.680645161 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6003584229 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.1344086022 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.0707849653 48.9658058833 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.105263158 100.406767564 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8421052632 20.6045352989 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26315789474 5.45110844103 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 11.8709677419 93% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.85842293907 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88709677419 164% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.371418122472 0.236089414692 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115501943576 0.076458572812 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.16665367644 0.0737576698707 226% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.271376826137 0.150856017488 180% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.173903331406 0.0645574589148 269% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 11.7677419355 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 58.1214874552 103% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.1575268817 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 10.9000537634 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 86.8835125448 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.002688172 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.0537634409 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.