Young people should be encouraged to pursue long-term, realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The proverb "there are no shortcuts to success" well explains the need for hardwork in a person's life. Such hardwork complements with well define goals. The prompt claims that working for long-term, realistic goals are more beneficial for young people than pursuing to seek immediate fame and recognition. I mostly agree with the above argument for two main reasons, which I will elucidate below. However, I do believe that such long-term goals can have its own challenges.
To begin, the long-term goals generally result in better returns than its short-term counterparts. It also comes with lessons that teach one to survive even when they fail to reach their destination. Famous scientists are good examples of the above statement. Many-a-time, scientists fail to achieve that one wish within their lifetime. For example, Stefan Hawking and Albert Eienstien who dedicated their life to the study of universe and its mysteries, were not able to empherically verify the existence of black whole, solely due to the limited technological advancement of their time. However, the discovery of a black hole boosted their importance to the society even after all these years. While, failure is not an option for the people looking for short-term fame and recognition. Hence, long-term goal teaches a person to look over the superficial fame and work for the betterment of oneself.
Secondly, even though a person is able to achieve the fame and recognition from a short-term goal, that person's problem is likely to increase thereafter. Manya times, rockstars and rappers do get famous from their single track. However, such stars fall into the traps of the instance limelight and are more stressed for producing better music. We know many of such star whose conditions worsened with time, i.e. declaring bankrupcy only a few years latter or hitting the headline for drugs usage. Studies shows people who are chasing instant fame on social media are normally more stressed and suffers from anxiety. Thus, I believe one should try to avoid such paths.
However, I do believe that setting up such long-term goals have its own challenges. Many people overstimate the results when trying to set a long-term plan. Such people will either fail to achieve their target or will be disappointed with the results. Also, even though this path teaches one with lessons in both failure and success, sometimes people stop trying futher, or even worst, misunderstand these lessons and just repeat the past. But, such issues can be reduce if the person evaluates the lessons well. Many successful startup owners are well examples of this statement, as they have seen both the failure and the success. Thus, I believe one should be careful when planning a long-term goals.
In conclusion, it is important for young people to avoid the shortcuts to fame and build a long-term goal which will benefit them.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | batterylow_123 | 66 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Jeyodi | 58 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | Snehil Dey | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | srijita02 | 79 | view |
| 2023-07-24 | srijita02 | 79 | view |
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 58
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- No field of study can advance significantly unless it incorporates knowledge and experience from outside that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the posit 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the director of a large group of hospitals In a laboratory study of liquid antibacterial hand soaps a concentrated solution of UltraClean produced a 40 percent greater reduction in the bacteria population than did the 58
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 100, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ell explains the need for hardwork in a persons life. Such hardwork complements with we...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 105, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ecognition from a short-term goal, that persons problem is likely to increase thereafte...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 698, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'goal'?
Suggestion: goal
...ld be careful when planning a long-term goals. In conclusion, it is important for ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, after all, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2432.0 2235.4752809 109% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15254237288 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63425765932 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.525423728814 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 730.8 704.065955056 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 27.0 20.2370786517 133% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.5902482141 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.0740740741 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4814814815 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25925925926 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.252432849512 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719926857006 0.0831039109588 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0720047429772 0.0758088955206 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168747272938 0.150359130593 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.071512968097 0.0667264976115 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.53 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.