The diagrams below show a small local museum and its surroundings in 1957 and 2007.
The two given maps illustrate the development in the layout of a particular small local museum and its grounds in 1957 and 2007.
In general, it can be seen that there were significant changes in the layout of the local museum. The museum became much larger, while the number of trees dramatically declined.
The national history exhibition replaces the local history located in the heart of the building. A museum storeroom was knocked down to renovate a small café at the right corner of the building. They extended a reception between the museum shop and the cafe, while there is a special exhibition next to an education center.
The entrance in the middle of the building was removed to the left-hand side, where a new museum shop located.
In 1957, visitors could go to the museum via the small path which was destructed in 2007. All trees are chopped down and removed from the roadside to the rear of the museum. Finally, people constructed a car park by the roadside.
large
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-07-11 | dorae | 67 | view |
2023-07-29 | Nguyen Anh Quach | 73 | view |
2023-07-06 | ramnu kaur | 78 | view |
2023-04-02 | ililmaidatuz | 73 | view |
2023-02-09 | hadgrid | view |
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 78
- The picture below shows the differences in the layout of conference center in 2010 and 2025 61
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 56
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured Sample ielts thanh loan 61
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Large
...onstructed a car park by the roadside. large
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 818.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78362573099 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53638075174 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573099415205 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 245.7 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 21.0620511822 43.030603864 49% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 81.8 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286584596728 0.215688989381 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103873753772 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0989225079534 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.159006209497 0.15604864568 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10159541293 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.2329268293 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.