The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant.
The graph illustrates the data of burglars per thousand cars in 4 different nations in the period of time from 1990 to 1999.
As can be seen clearly from the chart, the amount per thousand vehicles stolen in great britain outnumbered the rest from the beginning until the end of 1999, while that in the last three nations fluctuated erraticly apart from sweden- the only figure witnessed an upward trend.
Having started all below 10 which is about 7, the cases of thefts counted per thousand automobiles in Canada took a nosedive and bottomed at approximately 5% during 1993, then soon regained to nearly 6%- still under its initial level. Likewise, those in France launched at more than 5%, and considered to be the lowest ratio of crimes per thousand vehicles. From 1990 onwards, cars had been stolen, counted per thousand rose and fell marginally, reaching a peak at nearly 8% in 1991 and 1995, before tailing off in the end at the same point with that in Canada.
At the number of carjackings per thousand, sweden and great britain made a huge gap by a ratio of about 1:2. It soon closed the gap due to the ceaseless leap by sweden's figure, and the downswing of auto thefts in great britain during the period of time between 1996 and 1999. those two ended up at around 14 and above 15 respectively.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | view | |
2023-09-03 | Lee Daisy | view | |
2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 84 | view |
2023-03-07 | datdatduy1 | 78 | view |
2022-07-22 | Ngoc21 | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at le 78
- The line graph shows thefts per thousand vehicles in four countries between 1990 and 1999 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 92, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...sand cars in 4 different nations in the period of time from 1990 to 1999. As can be seen cl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 37, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Having started all below 10 which is about 7, the cases of thefts counted per...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...per thousand automobiles in Canada took a nosedive and bottomed at approximately 5% during...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 435, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...olen, counted per thousand rose and fell marginally, reaching a peak at nearly 8%...
^^
Line 7, column 239, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...auto thefts in great britain during the period of time between 1996 and 1999. those two ended ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Those
...e period of time between 1996 and 1999. those two ended up at around 14 and above 15 ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, so, still, then, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 33.7804878049 148% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1087.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68534482759 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43298634653 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 106.607317073 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616379310345 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 312.3 283.868780488 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 68.3199046765 43.030603864 159% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.875 112.824112599 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 22.9334400587 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 5.23603664747 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153259119539 0.215688989381 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711884132139 0.103423049105 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432956351514 0.0843802449381 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104067332537 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0380586015421 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.