The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburg. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph depicts the number of tourists visiting four distinctive types of tourist attractions including aquarium, castle, zoo, and festival in Scotland during a 30-year period from 1980 to 2010. The figures are illustrated in percentages.
Over the period, it is clear that amongst all four categories, zoos and castles were more popular. Especially, aquariums received by far the highest proportion of visitors. In 1980, over 20 percent of tourists to Edinburgh went to aquariums, then in 1995, this number peaked at about 45 percent. However, after 1995, it gradually decreased to only 30% in 2010. Similarly, the percentage of travelers to castles dropped slightly from 30 percent to about 28 percent during the meantime.
In the first 25 years of the time period, aquariums were more favored when compared to zoos. In 1980, 20 percent of tourists chose to see marine animals while only 10 percent of them went to observe land species. 30 years since then, the two’s tourist rates all underwent fluctuations before intersecting in 2005. This year, each of the attractions welcomed roughly 15 percent of visitors. Nevertheless, after this point, the number of zoo visitors went up to 20 percent whereas this of aquarium visitors dropped by 10 percent, reaching 8 percent approximately.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-07 | vivianisme | 84 | view |
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburg Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The graph shows the percentage of UK adolescents following a vegetarian diet Summerise the information by selecting and reporting the main features 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, nevertheless, similarly, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1096.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 209.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24401913876 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.80221413058 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82076793796 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602870813397 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 309.6 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 1.53170731707 261% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.8300095987 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.3333333333 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4166666667 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0843919245195 0.215688989381 39% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312121986284 0.103423049105 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527252135951 0.0843802449381 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842763076658 0.15604864568 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725350328074 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.