Some students decide early in life to pursue vocational careers that involve cooking or baking. For them, it is better to study their chosen occupations in high school rather than regular subjects.
To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Many students have a tendency to choose their vocational careers such as cooking or baking at early age. Therefore, it is believed that these students better acquire knowledge concerning their chosen jobs instead of learning a wide range of academic subjects at terriary school level. I disagree with this trend owing to several reasons.
On one hand, it can be beneficial that students should study some future-job related subjects at high school. The first reason is that being engaged in these subjects would make them more focused on the grounds that these subjects play an indispensable role in their career path. Take cooking as an example, if these students are allowed to participate in cooking classes, they are more likely to learn attentively. Secondly, vocational careers usually require hands-on experience. Therefore, attending some vocational subjects solely necessitates learners to obtain experience in factual situations, which is fundamental in making them a prospect candidate for their future job.
On the other hand, I strongly believe that being occupied with a range of academic disciplines would benefit students in their vocational jobs to a greater extent. The fact that students who are equipped with in-depth knowledge in chemistry or biology are more likely to perform better at workplace. In addition, learning different school subjects at high school provide students a means to train their mindset and cultivate their ability to adapt themselves in various settings, which is absolutely vital in this competitive job market of contemporary world. For instance, a chef who has profound knowledge of nutrition and chemical substances usually receive a preference over others.
In conclusion, despite some benefits of learning some job-related subjects this is more advantageous for those who make decision to pursue vocational jobs to learn a range of school subjects at high school.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1623.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46464646465 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82312340048 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.558922558923 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.503931307 49.4020404114 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.846153846 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.30769230769 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299211552055 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108834745894 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545169457834 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19665152875 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326395181472 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.