The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA.
The table illustrates data related to underprivileged people in three different states in the USA, namely California, Utal and Florida.
Overall, except for Florida, the proportions of young people living under poverty line are higher than those of oldsters in their 60s. Besides, despite having the highest income per person, poor people in California constitute the most significant proportion of its total population when compared with other states.
Regarding two age categories of underprivileged people, it is evident that Florida has more people whose age is over 60 struggling with poverty than those under 18 with a gap of 7%. By contrast, 17% of the poor in California are children, which is 5% more than old people. Remarkably, Utal witnesses the biggest difference between the proportions of these two age groups with the figures are 28% for adolescents and 8% for the old.
A noticeable variation is also seen in the percentage of the population below poverty line in three states when California has the greatest poverty rate, at 16%. Moreover, nearly one-tenth and 12% of residents in Utal and Floria respectively have financial difficulties. Finally, in terms of average income, poor people in California and Florida shared similar wages, at around 22,500 dollars while those in Utal are paid 17,000 dollars.
- The diagram below shows the floor plan of a public library 20 years ago and how it looks now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make a comparisons where relevant 11
- The climograph below shows average monthly temperatures and rainfall in the city of Kolkata Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000 73
- The diagrams below show changes in Felixstone in the UK between 1967 and 2001 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, finally, if, moreover, regarding, so, while, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1124.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30188679245 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87655417153 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.617924528302 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.8047141851 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.888888889 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5555555556 22.9334400587 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77777777778 5.23603664747 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.206186631292 0.215688989381 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781834485279 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813618350698 0.0843802449381 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120166626903 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0394292944726 0.0819641961636 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 61.2550243902 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 40.7170731707 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.