Today, many people do not know their neighbors. What problems does this cause? What can be done about this?
In the contemporary time, almost people are busy and have less spare time with their co-neighbors due to their nature works. This issue brings some negative effects. In this essay, we will discuss about some negative points and give some solutions.
To begin with, there are a group of depressed people because of less communicating with their public. According to some researchers, a shared issue is a half solution; thus, if they do not share their problems with the others in the neighborhoods, they can be depressed and afford to kill their self. Furthermore, having no friends they would have some health disease. For example, according to some UK study, almost Psychology problems are results from not having any contact with the others.
Moreover, there are some ways to solve this problem. Firstly, it is easy when we use the festivals and traditional days to have a meal with the public. At that time, they would have opportunities to contact with their neighbors and close the gathering. Additionally, the local authorities can build parks. According to some researcher, people often use their free time at the dawn to do morning exercise; thus, that can be opportunity for them to meet their neighbors and have communication.
In conclusion, working hard cause people do not have time with their co-neighbors, that would bring some negative aspects incorporate being depressed and having health diseases. However, we also have some ways to address this issue consist of spending time with neighbors in holidays or some special days and building some area to do morning exercise.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'groups'?
Suggestion: groups
... solutions. To begin with, there are a group of depressed people because of less com...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, thus, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1334.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.11111111111 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74407082504 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 176.041082164 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521072796935 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 407.7 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.2188680955 49.4020404114 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2857142857 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.78571428571 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199070766857 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834435777637 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.051023081529 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146831944262 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0287979922705 0.056905535591 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.92 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 78.4519038076 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.