The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban, rural and town between 1995 and 2010.
The bar diagram illustrates the changes in the percentage of people born in Australia and the who were born outside Australia living in the urban, rural and town between the year 1995 and 2010.
In the year 1995, the people living in cities were the people born outside Australia which was 5% more than the people born in Australia. While people born outside Australia that live in rural areas is 10% more than the people born in Australia. As for the people living in cities, people born in Australia is 5% more than that of the number of people born outside Australia. Taking a glance at the chart in 2010, the people living in cities who were born outside Australia is at par by 15% to the people born in Australia. While the number of people residing in towns and rural areas remains the same for the people born in Australia, there is a major decline in the trend by 3-5% for the people who are born outside Australia in both, the towns as well as the rural areas.
The people habitating the cities born outside Australia remains the same in the year 1995 and 2010. As compared to the people living in rural areas in the year 2010 and 1995 in both situations, there is not much difference except for a major decline in 2010. But the people residing in town have experienced a major decrease in the trend by more than 20% in the year 1995 and 2010 for the people born outside Australia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-04 | honguyenlily | 67 | view |
| 2023-11-29 | Alexanderpopov | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-02 | tracywu | 67 | view |
| 2023-10-23 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | Linh12324r | view |
- The bar chart below describes some changes about the percentage of people were born in Australia and who were born outside Australia living in urban rural and town between 1995 and 2010 67
- Process the lifecycle of a butterfly 11
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...more than the people born in Australia. While people born outside Australia that live...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 748, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...rn outside Australia in both, the towns as well as the rural areas. The people habitati...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, well, while, as for, except for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 33.7804878049 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1141.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 256.0 196.424390244 130% => OK
Chars per words: 4.45703125 4.92477711251 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22958607754 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 79.0 106.607317073 74% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.30859375 0.547539520022 56% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 340.2 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 43.4383343245 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.777777778 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.4444444444 22.9334400587 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 5.23603664747 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.592343465504 0.215688989381 275% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.372294996893 0.103423049105 360% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.153443795035 0.0843802449381 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.522603919976 0.15604864568 335% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.171877041022 0.0819641961636 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.88 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.44 8.06136585366 80% => OK
difficult_words: 23.0 40.7170731707 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.