Many women now have children later in life. What are the causes? What are the pros and cons of this trend?
Whether should women delay childbearing in their thirties has been blazing a row in public eyes in recent years. While strong support for this idea exist on the ground, there are others, however, fiercely condemn it for their own reasons. In this essay, I am going to illuminate both side of this issue and then give my opinion on the matter
Initially, the preliminary reason why women choose to getting married late is that they are financially insecure. To be specific, women nowadays have more options rather than settling down. Influx of women want to climb up their career ladder or to reach a certain job title before conceiving so that they can prepare well for their children.
On the one hand, there are numerous advantages when women choose to delay childbearing. One of the greatest benefits is that they have more time to upgrade their career cornerstone. A child who are born can be emotionally and physically healthy as their financial stability background. Another advantage is that older mom are more likely to be prepared emotionally. Undoubtedly, their sense of maturity comes along with the age. Older mothers have more time to experience things and acquire wide rages of living skills so that their child can be well nurtured. Another evidence suggest that older moms are less likely to scold or implement physically punishment on their child.
On the other hand, besides the advantages, there are also some disadvantages that we could worry about. Firstly, delay giving birth can increase high risk rate of getting infected some genetic disorder or being miscarriage. There are amounts of evidence point that women who try to conceive after the age of 35 can easily endure a stressful pregnancy or being infertility. Another disadvantage when it comes to conceiving when older is that it can generate a sandwich gap or a gap generation. There is a pronounced different from parent age over 50 to a child 15 years old. Some parents do not comprehensively understand their children that lead to restrict their children interests or hobbies.
- Admission to art galleries or museums should be free of charge Do you agree or disagree 78
- Should the country hold an international sport events 56
- Admission to art galleries or museums should be free of charge Do you agree or disagree 78
- Should the country hold an international sport events 56
- Children obessed with playing computers Do the advantages outweight the disadvantages 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether should women delay childbearing in thei...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 578, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'suggests'.
Suggestion: suggests
... can be well nurtured. Another evidence suggest that older moms are less likely to scol...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, firstly, however, if, so, then, well, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02915451895 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70944789057 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7405285076 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.8333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0555555556 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0853889290423 0.244688304435 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0273301146548 0.084324248473 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0282240166951 0.0667982634062 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0599145405577 0.151304729494 40% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.025592404565 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.4159519038 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.