The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA
The line graph **illustrates** the similarities and differences between China and the USA's birth rates during the period from 1920 to 2000.
Overall, it is evident that both nations saw considerable fluctuations in **fertility**, with lows during the 1940s and highs during the 1950s.
**Increasing marginally** from 10% in 1920 to 15% in 1935, China’s birth rates then saw a **pronounced drop** to just 5% in the 1940s. This was followed by a period of **exponential growth**, with fertility **reaching a peak** of 20% in the 1950s. This trend didn’t last long, as the other half of the century brought a **gradual decrease** in the figure.
Following the same pattern as China, the USA’s birth rates also fluctuated between 11% to 13% prior to the 1940s, before a **sharp drop** to approximately 1945. The next 5 years saw a **rapid climb** of birth rates to 15%, somewhere in the vicinity of the 1950s, then **decline steadily** in the following year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-22 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-09 | trinhthanh1 | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | hahoaan | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Scientists predict in the near future cars will be driven by computers not people 89
- The graph below compares the changes in the birth rates of China and the USA 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 810.0 965.302439024 84% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0625 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01452214289 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 98.0 106.607317073 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.6125 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 209.7 283.868780488 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 17.8679967014 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 112.824112599 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8571428571 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.57142857143 5.23603664747 49% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 3.70975609756 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232301421376 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107540510698 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109819197392 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149515402342 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113997772373 0.0819641961636 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.