The charts detail the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed, employed or further education in 1980, 1990, and 2000.
The given pie chart represents the percentage of people in Australia who were employed, unemployed, or in further education after secondary school graduate during the period shown
It can be seen that while the proportion of employed increases, the figures for unemployed and pursuing higher education decrease.
As is presented in the pie charts the percentage of employed increased constantly from 1980 to 2000. The proportion of employed was highest. 40% was the percentage of employed in 1980, accounted for two-fifths, but in 2000 the percentages increase to 55%, make up for more than a half. It is predicted that the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who are employed will be higher.
There was a dropped dramatically in higher education while the proportion of unemployed decreased gradually. During the given period, the percentages of further education fall constantly from 10% to 8%. In 1980 higher education occupied a half, but in 1990 it just accounted for more than a third with 37%. Employed has experienced the dominant with 55% take up more than a half. The proportion of unemployed fluctuated around 2% from 1980 to 2000. It just makes up for a minority.
In conclusion, there was a change in the proportion of Australian secondary school graduates who were unemployed, employed, or in further education from 1980 to 2000
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-28 | minhnhat2002 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | ngocanh005 | 84 | view |
| 2023-06-18 | ngocanh005 | view | |
| 2023-06-11 | baguette | view | |
| 2023-03-05 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 114, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...were employed, unemployed, or in further education after secondary school graduat...
^^
Line 2, column 132, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...and pursuing higher education decrease. As is presented in the pie charts the perc...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, second, third, while, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19545454545 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99501997124 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.459090909091 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 330.3 283.868780488 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 70.5389470828 43.030603864 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.25 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 22.9334400587 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488193373448 0.215688989381 226% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.188409410723 0.103423049105 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143100531819 0.0843802449381 170% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.298727230597 0.15604864568 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117493571277 0.0819641961636 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.