Nowadays, more and more younger people need to compete with older people for the same jobs. What problems does this cause? What would you suggest as a solution?
In the present day, an increasing number of graduates feel uneasy to gain a specific job in the labor market where not only young candidates but also many seniors must be involved in relatively competitive rounds to demonstrate why they are eligible for the position. This phenomenon can contribute to various issues; however, many solutions can be proposed to address its problems.
To commence with, a number of social issues can be attributed to this competition. Firstly, the majority of graduate students will have to get involved in the competing job market with people who are more experienced and competent at plenty of work when compared to freshmen. This will accidentally lead to the reality that some young people might fail to secure positions in the workforce. As a result of this fact, the unemployment rate will gradually increase, which eventually results in social problems such as robbery, sexual abuse, burglary, etc. On the other hand, if the elderly are made redundant to create more vacancies for young applicants, many will be thrown into poverty as they do not possess sufficient financial means to help them support themselves, as well as their families.
However, there are numerous resolutions to this phenomenon. One of the most proper and effective ways is that senior workers can take over the position of consultants who will help freshmen in understanding more about the job they are taking charge of, as well as having a deeper insight into the working environment and criteria that need achieving in the workplace. This approach will not only gain the satisfaction of both newcomers and older colleagues, but it also helps boost productivity and harmony in the workplace. In addition, managers and employers ought to provide junior workers with adequate social benefits so that they can retire without losing their standards of living.
To sum up, there have been several social problems resulting from the current trend. However, with great efforts made by both recruiters and employees, its downsides can be mitigated
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-23 | zhao_kangg | 89 | view |
- The use of mobile phones is as antisocial as smoking Smoking is banned in certain places so mobile phones should be banned like smoking To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Spoken communication is more powerful than written communication To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- In some countries online shopping is now replacing shopping in stores Do you think it is a negative or positive development 89
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
- Many employers find that their new employees lack sufficient interpersonal skills such as lack of ability to work with colleagues as a team What are the causes Can you suggest some possible solutions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ployees, its downsides can be mitigated
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, so, well, in addition, such as, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1782.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 333.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35135135135 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27180144563 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.30251150762 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606606606607 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.3171759141 49.4020404114 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.076923077 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6153846154 20.7667163134 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.61538461538 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174344871933 0.244688304435 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0595482140634 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0397773357166 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0942547910633 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0526855699744 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.