The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full-time work after leaving college in 2008. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The two given bar charts compare destination of UK graduate and postgraduate students excluding full-time work in 2008.
Overall, the order and the rate of each decision between graduate and postgraduate was quite similar. Most students chose further study to prepare for their future, then part-time work was the second most chosen. Number of students unemployed was the third order, and less students chose voluntary work.
On the one hand, further study was chosen by most students, which has 29665 chosen times in graduate students and 2725 chosen times in postgraduate one. It means that most students during this time wanted to advance their knowledge. Besides, the rate of postgraduate students who did part-time work was little higher than graduate students. 17735 graduate students chose it in comparison with 2535 postgraduate students.
On the other hand, the number of students who failed in finding jobs made up a big number. 16235 graduate students and 1625 postgraduate students were not accepted to work. Voluntary work was a choice that least students chose. Solely 3500 graduate students and 345 postgraduate students in the UK became volunteers.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | huongmaxngoan | 73 | view |
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work after leaving college in 2008 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun students is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...nts unemployed was the third order, and less students chose voluntary work. On the ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, second, so, then, third, at least, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 986.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35869565217 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65775873143 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548913043478 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 283.868780488 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.6461178397 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 82.1666666667 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.3333333333 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.08333333333 5.23603664747 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.263569821813 0.215688989381 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124111632789 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068980676471 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197502170242 0.15604864568 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0612586554079 0.0819641961636 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.3012195122 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 11.4140731707 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.