The chart below shows the number of men and women in further education in Britain in three periods and whether they were studying full-time or part-time.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart gives information about the number of male and female in tertiary in Britain in 1970/71, 1980/81 and 1990/91, as long as their forms of studying (full-time or part-time).
It can be seen from the chart that the number of women enrolled in further education both full-time and part-time education was higher than men. Moreover, full-time education was recorded raising gradually throughout the three given periods. Finally, the number of men studied in universities in terms of part-time training was slightly fluctuating.
From the beginning, male in part-time education was 1000 thousands, which was higher than female in 1970/71. Gradually, the number of women in tertiary education grew up remarkably and it approximately reached 800 thousands, which less than the number of men nearly 150 thousands people. In 1990/91, there was a noticeable increase in the number of female followed part-time training, and the number of women during that period was more than men about 500 thousands students.
In terms of full-time education, it was considered that both two sexes were moderately climbed up in three given periods. Howerver, in 1970/71, the number of female joining in further education was nearly hit the bottom, and in particularly, it was around 50 to 100 thoundsands people. Then, during 1990/91, male students in full-time education was more than 200 thousands, and it was the same in female.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-31 | fdsugb22 | view | |
| 2023-07-06 | Selena17_ | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-13 | ntqkhai | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-26 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2022-09-28 | devanshgera8@gmail.com | view |
- Some people prefer to work for themselves or own a business Others prefer to work for an employer Would you rather be self employed work for someone else or own a business Use specific reasons to explain your choice 61
- There is a lot of pressure on young people today to succeed academically As a result some people believe that non academic subjects such as physical education and cookery should be removed from the school syllabus so that children can concentrate on acade 87
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The chart below shows the proportion of profits made from the seven most viewed movie genres in US cinemas in 1995 2000 and 2005 as a percentage of the total earnings of the US film industry for each year 78
- The charts below give information about the way in which water was used in different countries in 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, moreover, then, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 3.97073170732 227% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1196.0 965.302439024 124% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29203539823 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81517485989 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469026548673 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 342.0 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4592051659 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.6 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.304820515174 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.156235928729 0.103423049105 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757837746151 0.0843802449381 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227042816853 0.15604864568 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0752710150062 0.0819641961636 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.61 61.2550243902 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.