The charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
The given line charts illustrate how many changes of electrical appliances were owned by people and how much time was spent by them when doing housework and households in one country over a period of 99 years from 1920 to 2019. Units are measured in percentage of households and number of hours per week, respectively.
Overall, it can clearly be seen that the ownership of all three electrical appliances increase whereas the time allocation for doing housework decrease. Moreover, while washing machines are the highest tools that people have at start, it was overtaken by refrigerator and vacuum cleaner by the end of period.
In terms of electrical appliances, the highest ownership at the beginning, the ownership of washing machine stood at exactly 40. It moderately rose by 30 in 1960 before falling to just above 60 twenty years later. From this point onward, it experienced a slight growth around 10 in 2019. Moreover, the two lowest electrical tools ownership at the start, the people with refrigerator and vacuum cleaner in their house started at 30 and just below 10, respectively. Both of them saw significant increase to 100 in 2000, and remained at the same level in the final year.
Regarding housework time at the start, people spent their time for washing clothes, preparing meals, and cleaning at exactly 50 in 1920. It declined tremendously by 30 in 40 years. Finally, it witnessed a slight decrease to about 15 in 1960, and remained at the same level in 1980 before declining to just above 10 in 2019.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-21 | steveminh | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-15 | dodi1234 | 73 | view |
| 2022-11-22 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-21 | NSMDeadshot0411 | 84 | view |
- It is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and their personal lives Do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledg 56
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 73
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasize that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or 61
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed by people and how much time was spent by them when doing housework and househo...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, moreover, regarding, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 5.60731707317 232% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1272.0 965.302439024 132% => OK
No of words: 258.0 196.424390244 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93023255814 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 3.73543355544 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73149960255 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.538759689922 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 375.3 283.868780488 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 1.53170731707 392% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.277194409 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198990658213 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0665258727383 0.103423049105 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0831512831795 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135109852494 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0772135709968 0.0819641961636 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.