The line graph shows tha consumption of fast food in gram in the USA from 1970 1990

Essay topics:

The line graph shows tha consumption of fast food in gram in the USA from 1970 - 1990

The line chart illustrates how much amount of fast food that was consumed in the USA over the
period of 20 years starting from 1970.

Looking at the chart, it is clear that Pizza was the most favorite junk food in US in 1970 at 300
gram because of the Europe food’s trend at the time while Hambuger and Fish & Chip were not
at the trending top of US fast food at that time with under 50 gram consumed. However, it was a
rapid descrease for the amount of pizza during 10 years later by around 200 gram. The amount of
gram of Hambuger and Fish & Chip slightly climed to 100 gram and 150 gram in 1980.

From that point on, Fish & Chip consumption shot up at 500 gram over the next 10 years (
1990) because of its diverse flavour and convenience. In contrast, Pizza stayed constant with a
figure that stable at almost 100 gram in 1990, compared with an equally significant increase of
Hambuger about 300 gram in that year.

Votes
Average: 6.7 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-07-23 khanhtuong 67 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...avorite junk food in US in 1970 at 300 gram because of the Europe food’s trend at t...
^^^^
Line 6, column 64, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...US fast food at that time with under 50 gram consumed. However, it was a rapid desc...
^^^^
Line 7, column 77, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...zza during 10 years later by around 200 gram. The amount of gram of Hambuger and Fi...
^^^^
Line 8, column 57, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... and Fish & Chip slightly climed to 100 gram and 150 gram in 1980. From that poin...
^^^^
Line 8, column 70, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...hip slightly climed to 100 gram and 150 gram in 1980. From that point on, Fish & ...
^^^^
Line 10, column 60, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... Fish & Chip consumption shot up at 500 gram over the next 10 years 1990 because o...
^^^^
Line 10, column 87, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ot up at 500 gram over the next 10 years 1990 because of its diverse flavour and ...
^^^
Line 12, column 34, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ith a figure that stable at almost 100 gram in 1990, compared with an equally signi...
^^^^
Line 13, column 20, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ificant increase of Hambuger about 300 gram in that year.
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, while, in contrast

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 32.9175257732 33% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 765.0 937.175257732 82% => OK
No of words: 172.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.4476744186 4.54256449028 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62144681703 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.17963861449 2.54303337028 86% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 127.690721649 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575581395349 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 207.9 290.88556701 71% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 1.44329896907 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 12.6804123711 47% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 16.3608247423 171% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.1450664797 44.8134815571 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.5 76.5299724578 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6666666667 16.8248392259 170% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.16666666667 4.34317383033 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 11.0 4.29896907216 256% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 9.0 2.54639175258 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.266184022474 0.216113520407 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133331711628 0.0766984524023 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668289255813 0.0603063233224 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102281758449 0.12726935374 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0443252634033 0.0580467560999 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 76.9 70.7449484536 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.12 8.71597938144 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.6 7.59969072165 100% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 41.2886597938 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 8.62886597938 197% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 8.54432989691 154% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.