Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Technology is developing at a rapid pace, so there is a large quantity of interesting and helpful programs on televisions and computers. However, there is a school of thought that reading stories from paper-based books has more benefits for children than watching TV as well as playing electronic games. While there are some compelling arguments to support this opinion, I strongly believe that counterarguments should be considered.
On the one hand, reading printed publications brings about long-term advantages for children’s development. That is to say, reading books can improve brain connectivity and comprehension because reading involves a complex network of circuits and signals in the brain. As a result, when the reading ability matures, those networks also get stronger and more sophisticated. Not only that but children also can build their language skills up for the reason that they are intensively exposed to a wide range of vocabulary and writing styles that are rarely seen in TV and computer games, thereby applying them in their own essays. On the whole, those above are convincing grounds for the superiority of the benefits of reading stories from books over watching TV or playing video games.
On the other hand, taking up electronic games and TV programs act as a precursor to an enhancement of skills related to technology. In other words, technology plays an important role in society in recent decades, which leads to the fact that people, especially children, need to acquire knowledge about how to use and develop it. Furthermore, motivational factors also make children have a preference for TV and video games. In particular, when children absorb knowledge, they lean towards studying from TV programs or playing educational games that make the lessons become more fascinating by providing players with rewards and higher ranks.in short, all of those arguments demonstrate the more beneficial features of TV programs and electronic games than printed materials.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that the advantages of books outweigh those of watching tv or playing games for children because books are more beneficial for the development of their brains and language skills which are limited when watching tv or playing games.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-07 | Phuong1810 | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-01 | dieulinhxinhgai | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-25 | pwlihnkt | 84 | view |
| 2023-03-18 | bepmy2992004 | 67 | view |
- summarize the information 11
- Some people think reading stories in books is better than watching TV or playing computer games for children To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people believe that everyone has a right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that everyone has the right to have access to university education and that governments should make it free for all students no matter what financial background they have To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Some people think learning history in school is important Others think learning subjects more relevant to life is important Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, so, well, while, in conclusion, in particular, in short, as a result, as well as, in other words, on the whole, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1912.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 357.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35574229692 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92897026971 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532212885154 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 580.5 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 72.0258007684 49.4020404114 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.076923077 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4615384615 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.6923076923 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.309661197644 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.111003975096 0.084324248473 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0878143572677 0.0667982634062 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.208621273279 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0405881474509 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.