The given bar chart illustrates the average time spent by tutors on teaching in 3 levels of educations, in 4 different countries in the year 2001.
Overall, it is obvious that the USA was the most interested in providing education, while teachers in Japan spent the least time span on doing this.
With regards to primary school, USA' teachers provided most of their time to teaching, with approximately 750 hours in the given year, well above Japan, Iceland and Spain which were represented by similar values of around 600 hours.
For lower-secondary level, the teachers from Iceland were the least keen to deliver their courses, providing only 600 hours for this, while the USA was the top country with 1000 hours. Japan and Spain accounted for an average figure, between 650 and 750 hours.
Finally, for upper secondary tuition, just under 1200 hours were allocated in the USA, which represented the highest figure on the graph. Iceland and Spain had an equal number of hours spent on this practice, of 900. By contrast, the least interested country in providing this level of knowledge was Japan, with just over half the USA figure.
The given bar chart illustrates the average time spent by tutors on teaching in 3 levels of educations, in 4 different countries in the year 2001.
Overall, it is obvious that the USA was the most interested in providing education, while teachers in Japan spent the least time span on doing this.
With regards to primary school, USA' teachers provided most of their time to teaching, with approximately 750 hours in the given year, well above Japan, Iceland and Spain which were represented by similar values of around 600 hours.
For lower-secondary level, the teachers from Iceland were the least keen to deliver their courses, providing only 600 hours for this, while the USA was the top country with 1000 hours. Japan and Spain accounted for an average figure, between 650 and 750 hours.
Finally, for upper secondary tuition, just under 1200 hours were allocated in the USA, which represented the highest figure on the graph. Iceland and Spain had an equal number of hours spent on this practice, of 900. By contrast, the least interested country in providing this level of knowledge was Japan, with just over half the USA figure.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-02 | Yeakub Ali | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 948.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9375 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50407653748 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557291666667 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.2415795761 43.030603864 112% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.5 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380180130351 0.215688989381 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.183758055439 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.162649200692 0.0843802449381 193% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.259268173 0.15604864568 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.155124329451 0.0819641961636 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.