The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000.
Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant.
The maps provide a clear overview of Brindell's evolvement over two decades, specifically being described under three milestones, which are 1800, 1900 and 2000. Although projecting land for living happened dramatically through periods, it still keeps the original frame.
Starting with Brindell essence, in 1800, no human artificial materials were implemented. However, just after a decade, farmland was replaced by an industrial zone and a small village for workers called "Bun Hill". Simultaneously, the great amount of woodland was diminished for the larger of crops and River Stour. That is to say, animal habitats have been gradually lost.
A substantial difference between 1900 and 2000 mainly illustrates the expansion of human demands by which dwindling the square of woodland to reach a low record of less than a half. The remaining was constructed under a part for workers living there named "Bun Hill Park". Moreover, it is obvious to see the housing area and place for factories extended nearly twice, leading to narrow the land should have been recorded as a part of River Stour. The place called "Brindell" was also widened and ended up with a circular border.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-12 | Anne020304 | 89 | view |
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Many students find it difficult to concentrate or pay attention at school What are the reasons What could be done to solve this problem 89
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- The graphs below show the development of Brindell from 1800 to 2000 Summarize the key features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, moreover, so, still, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.48453608247 147% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1021.0 937.175257732 109% => OK
No of words: 189.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.40211640212 4.54256449028 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.70779275107 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00223408132 2.54303337028 118% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 127.690721649 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.687830687831 0.622605031667 110% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6804123711 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7241526699 44.8134815571 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.1 76.5299724578 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9 16.8248392259 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 4.34317383033 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0610045582842 0.216113520407 28% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0249160208981 0.0766984524023 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360020209882 0.0603063233224 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468625702161 0.12726935374 37% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020035208897 0.0580467560999 35% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 8.37731958763 161% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 8.71597938144 161% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 7.59969072165 126% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 41.2886597938 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 8.62886597938 104% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.