the maps below show information about a coal mine before and after redevelopment as a visitor attraction
The diagrams illustrate the development of the coal mine between before and after redevelopment as attraction tourists.
As can be seen from the pictures, it is clear that the coal mine witnesses a significant modernization remarkable developments. Most noticeably, a number of features have been moved and modified, while other facilities have been added.
In the left sides of a coal mine, the office and staff changing room for workers had been transformed into a museum for tourists. And beside the museum is parking area, where has still remained since before the coal mine developed. In addition, the entrance development that used to be for workers is now open to visitors. Some new places were built from the empty area at the bottom of the diagram such as the lottery park and the area for the children to play in.
In the present-map, the bottom of the dìagram show the most significant change. A waste tip on the top right of the diagram was replaced by the digging driving track while the bottom right made way for picnic area to tourists when they coming here. Besides, the car parking and director board was dispersed and were taken place of the cafe. That also contributes to the development of coal mine tourism.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, still, while, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1022.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84360189573 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68203737829 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.578199052133 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.8739065479 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.9090909091 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193841061382 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829260339209 0.103423049105 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103124462852 0.0843802449381 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14679372383 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.12171107062 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.