Students leave high school without learning how to manage their money.
What are the reasons and solutions for this issue?
There is no doubt that high school graduates lack an understanding of money management, which has several consequences. This essay will outline a number of reasons for this trend and a number of possible solutions to help tackle the issue.
On the one hand, one of the reasons that impacts students is a lack of formal education. What I mean is that in school’s circumstances, they only educate learners in some main subjects that are full of theory, resulting in students wasting their money as much as possible. For example, some schools in Vietnam just focus on achievement in marks and certification and ignore teaching students the necessary skills. Moreover, another factor related to this problem is parental influence. As the young have a meagre income that comes from their parents' support, Therefore, pupils constantly rely on their parents' budget to purchase their interests without thinking. This is because parents do not prioritise teaching their children about the importance of money.
On the other hand, there are a number of viable solutions to help tackle this problem. Firstly, school systems need to supply more life skills, particularly money management, which is essential when students step out of the real world. Students should learn how to manage their finances. Secondly, in terms of parenting, if they keep comfortably giving money to their kids, it would have a detrimental impact. Thus, teaching them how to use money effectively and showing them the significance of money Also, schools ought to cooperate with parents to open some workshops to find ways to work together. Additionally, it is essential to encourage learners to do some part-time jobs so they realise how hard they work to earn money and cherish them.
In conclusion, although money management is a problem for a lot of school leavers, there are a number of viable solutions to counteract this problem.
- The charts below show the favourite takeaways of people in Canada and the number of Indian restaurants in Canada between 1960 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at leas
- The bar shows the percentage of people going to cinemas in one European country in different days
- the maps show changes that took place in Felixstone from 1967 to 2001 78
- In many nations people in huge cities either live alone or in small family units instead of in large extended family groups Is this a positive or negative trend 78
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i mean, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16451612903 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80327777523 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3762306314 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412347278 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126523634038 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688776163219 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236791026166 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151294977363 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, i mean, in conclusion, no doubt, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.16451612903 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80327777523 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561290322581 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.3762306314 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.412347278 0.244688304435 169% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126523634038 0.084324248473 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0688776163219 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.236791026166 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151294977363 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.7 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.