The chart below gives information about Southland's main exports in 2000, 2023 and future projections for 2025.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given chart depicts the data regarding three many categories of exporting goods (dairy, Meat products) and tourism industry in Southern parts of the World in the years 2000, 2023 and 2025.
Overall, in 2025 Southland's tourism will be increased significantly and will be remained as highest ranking category as it was in the previous 2000, 2023 years. However, exporting meats and dairy production worldwide are more likely to be declined in the economy budgets in the future.
In 2000, International tourism showed made a profit ₤8 billon to Southland’s economy by far the most important means of main exports. Over the following 23 years, however, milk production overtakes the other two vendors in the current year. To be precise, dairy production sees a dramatic rise close to ₤10 billion, which is unexpectedly almost triple the development of second most successful career of today’s exporting needs, tourism field. But on the flip side, the reputation of dairy manufacturing is likely to be witnessed a minimal drop, just as half number as tourism’s current growth, decreased by ₤0.5 billion accordingly. On the one hand, international tourism is more likely to experience an increase by ₤1 billion, reaching a peak of well under ₤10 billion by the following years. Interestingly, the only production of meat do not represent any upward trend, and only has been plunged markedly over a 25-year period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-08-20 | shakhzodakarimova | 78 | view |
- The chart below gives information about Southland s main exports in 2000 2023 and future projections for 2025 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The diagram shows the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, however, if, regarding, second, so, well, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1203.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25327510917 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88731828059 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 106.607317073 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620087336245 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 350.1 283.868780488 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3480302604 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.666666667 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912626959663 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0396878730656 0.103423049105 38% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0464550563225 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785889351519 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297680643115 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.2329268293 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 40.7170731707 155% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.