Some people think the government should support artists like painters, musicians, and poets, while others believe this wastes money. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
While some people believe that the artists should be sponsored by the government, others think that supporting them is a waste of money. In this essay, I will discuss both the arguments and express my view with the relevant examples.
To commence with, few artists are God-gifted. They have unbelievable talent which can be mesmerizing. If such art is not showcased, it will be unworthy. Funding artists like painters, musicians and poets can help them to reach and perform on international platforms. It is a kind of service to the public. For instance, the Chief Minister of Mumbai City holds an audition for the incoming stream of participants every year. Besides, another reason to help them is to help the nation and promote the cultural heritage. For example, dance art and poetries are recognized worldwide which keeps civilians from touching their roots. Finally, the legendary artists return to the country in some or the other way.
On the other hand, few indeed think that supporting such people can be a waste of money if it is not beneficial for their own country. This is because spending on an individual sometimes proves useless compared to the public welfare. Instead, they can look after social issues such as poverty, development, and education. Moreover, the state should decide cautiously as it is the taxes filed by citizens. For instance, the centralized money is invested in production for some events only for a day. Furthermore, these responsibilities might affect the economy.
In my opinion, I moderately agree with the latter argument, as this is an utter waste of funds on an individual. The government should limit the quota to art holders as the private sector already invests in them for business purposes instead.
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category or exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 90
- You ordered an item from an online store and it has arrived damaged Describe the problem and why you are unhappy Arrange for an engineer to visit your home Request a reduction in your bill
- Modern communications mean that it s no longer necessary to write letters To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 61
- You and your family are living in rented accommodation in an English speaking country You are not satisfied with the condition of some of the furniture Write a letter to your landlord In your letter introduce yourself explain what is wrong with the furnit 73
- WRITING TASK 2 You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Every country has poor people and every country has different ways of dealing with the poor What are some of the reasons for world poverty How can the poor be he 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, furthermore, if, look, moreover, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1468.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 289.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07958477509 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8017427318 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59169550173 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3728538439 49.4020404114 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 77.2631578947 106.682146367 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2105263158 20.7667163134 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.31578947368 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280259165027 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0699033087069 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10138899761 0.0667982634062 152% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188889243302 0.151304729494 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.135832094844 0.056905535591 239% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 13.0946893788 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.78957915832 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.