Some people believe that society should try to save every plant and animal species, despite the expense to humans in effort, time, and financial well-being. Others believe that society need not make extraordinary efforts, especially at a great cost in money and jobs, to save endangered species.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinction every day. Some of these plants and animals are used for the production of important medicine for mankind, source of food in some part of the word, some benefits are yet to be determine, while some have research that are underway. Should we let them go to journey of no return because it cost us money and jobs. The prompt of this essay says that living things that are not human whose saving can lead to financial break down should be allowed to go to extinction.
I mostly disagree with these prompt that we should only save plant that are cheaper to save, with three reasons below.
To start with, extinction is not a trivial topic in this world. In fact, animals like dinosaur that where once dominating this world many years ago are nowhere to be found because of human activities. For example, research output from university of Maryland on evolution biology early this year what able to predict that assuming the dinosaur are still in existent, their genome would have been use for the development of effective cure for cancer. Likewise, a plant or animal species that do not really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. In addition, because we can’t tap into the usefulness of a thing at a particular time do not means they hold not an intrinsic value. What if the species end up being the major source of income or major source of novel discovery later on. The finding of this research from Maryland shows that assuming human had where able to conserve dinosaurs that were view with no value then, it would have led to great breakthrough in sciences today. This finding underscores the important of saving plant and animal regardless of whether they cost us money or jobs because we don’t know the benefits they hold in the future.
Secondly there is always a need to maintain a balance in the ecosystem for us to have a healthy life and preserved our safe haven. Ozone layer for example need to receive the amount of air requires in a close circle, by constant circulation of air and mineral resources. However, allowing plant or and animal species to die because of our beneficial can disturbed the nutrient circle in the atmosphere and apparently affecting the ozone later. For example, research carried out by Prof. John from Yale, highlight that, if we save these species of organism, we will have adequate amount of oxygen flow through the atmosphere. This study hereby showcasing reduction in heat that is causing the destruction of our ozone layers. This finding shows the important of saving them regardless of what benefits they hold to human eyes. Even though they do not yield financial benefits at hand, they save great function in protecting our precious atmosphere.
Nonetheless, some will argue that while waste money and other precious resources on plant and animal species that do not currently yield revenue for a nation, when we can focus on those that are and build on them. However, human endeavors and decision making shouldn’t be solely monetary based or momentary benefits. in addition, for the plant and animals we thought are not of great important to our economy today might end up being the major influencer of stable system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-07 | guozhishan | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-25 | topeibisanmi@gmail.com | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 90 | view |
| 2023-10-10 | nihalashah | 70 | view |
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 58
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious 66
- The primary goal of technological advancement should be to increase people s efficiency so that they have more leisure time 66
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore the negative ones 16
- Leaders are created by the demands that are placed on them Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting your position y 50
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
Latest research by cell report shows that many...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'researches'.
Suggestion: researches
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...test research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...t really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
... of a thing at a particular time do not means they hold not an intrinsic value. What ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
...o have a healthy life and preserved our safe haven. Ozone layer for example need to receiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 949, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in protecting our precious atmosphere. Nonetheless, some will argue that while ...
^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y monetary based or momentary benefits. in addition, for the plant and animals we ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in fact, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81611208406 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44752434995 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486865148862 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.362186072 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7916666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200386018874 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585265262101 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369853624321 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124984662282 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395813942054 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: ' the Latest'.
Suggestion: The Latest
Latest research by cell report shows that many...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 8, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'researches'.
Suggestion: researches
Latest research by cell report shows that many plant an...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 43, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun plant seems to be countable; consider using: 'many plants'.
Suggestion: many plants
...test research by cell report shows that many plant and animal species are going to extinct...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 536, Rule ID: BE_CAUSE[1]
Message: Did you mean 'because'?
Suggestion: because
...t really have value at the moment might be cause of technology that is yet to catch up. ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 677, Rule ID: DONT_NEEDS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'mean'?
Suggestion: mean
... of a thing at a particular time do not means they hold not an intrinsic value. What ...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 120, Rule ID: SAFE_HAVEN[1]
Message: Use simply 'haven'.
Suggestion: haven
...o have a healthy life and preserved our safe haven. Ozone layer for example need to receiv...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 949, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in protecting our precious atmosphere. Nonetheless, some will argue that while ...
^^^
Line 5, column 318, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...y monetary based or momentary benefits. in addition, for the plant and animals we ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, really, second, secondly, so, still, then, while, for example, in addition, in fact, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 21.0 11.3162921348 186% => OK
Pronoun: 58.0 33.0505617978 175% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 85.0 58.6224719101 145% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2750.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 571.0 442.535393258 129% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81611208406 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.88831323574 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44752434995 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 278.0 215.323595506 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.486865148862 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 862.2 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.362186072 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.583333333 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7916666667 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.08333333333 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200386018874 0.243740707755 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585265262101 0.0831039109588 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0369853624321 0.0758088955206 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124984662282 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0395813942054 0.0667264976115 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.38706741573 94% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.