The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph illustrates the amount of fish and some different kinds of meat consumed in a European nation from 1979 to 2004.
It is apparent that the consumption of beef is the highest while the figure for fish is the lowest at the beginning of the period. However, there was an increase in chicken use and reached the highest in 2004, while fish consumption remained unchanged throughout the period.
There is a decrease in the consumption of beef and lamb between 1979 and 2004. The use of beef in a European country decreased by about 2 times, 225 grams to 100 grams per person per week. Similarly, the amount of lamb consumed in 1979 reached 150 grams, and this number declined significantly to about 52 grams, which was a three-fold decrease.
The figure in chicken use fluctuated with an upward tendency throughout 25 years. In 1979, chicken consumption was around 150 grams per person per week, while it reached a peak at 250 grams at the end of the period, which was increased by nearly 2 times. There was no change in the amount of fish used between 1979 and 2004, around 50 grams per person per week.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 82 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 67 | view |
2024-06-16 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
- The graph below shows the proportion of four different materials that were recycled from 1982 to 2010 in a particular country Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph gives information about the percentage of the population of four different Asian countries living in cities between 1970 and 2020 with additional predictions for 2030 and 2040 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main feature 73
- In many countries today there are many highly qualified without employment What factors may have caused this situation and what in your opinion can should be done about it 67
- The graph gives information about the consumption of fast food in grams per week in the UK from 1970 to 1990 73
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 924.0 965.302439024 96% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.6432160804 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51466243931 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.467336683417 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2328412717 43.030603864 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.666666667 112.824112599 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.269718808971 0.215688989381 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.133631913432 0.103423049105 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.134068166018 0.0843802449381 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.20482843189 0.15604864568 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144706372911 0.0819641961636 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.95 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.