The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in the UK from 1984 to 2003.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of moviegoers once or more times a month divided into four separate age groups in the UK from 1984 to 2003. Overall, The number of cinema-goers increased steadily in four groups during the given period, while the highest percentage of those who attended the cinema was among the group 15-24.
The age group of 15-24 always had the largest proportion of moviegoers compared to other groups, during the period from 1984 to 2003, this number rose from roughly 15% to more than half. Another age group also witnessed a threefold increase, particularly in the 7-14 age group. However, the number of people who went to cinema of both age groups underwent the decrease after the year 2003.
More people in the two older age groups went to the movies between 1984 and 2003, whereas the 25-35 age group experienced a significant sixfold increase. The group 35 and over had the lowest rate of increase, a modest increase of slightly over 5% over the 19-year period.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-11-14 | HoaQuynh123 | 84 | view |
- Some people believe that crime is a result of social problems and poverty others think that crime is a result of bad person s nature Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
- In many countries obesity and unhealthy eating habits are increasing What are the reasons for this trend What is the most effective way to prevent it 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of people of different age groups who went to the cinema once a month or more in the UK from 1984 to 2003 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 833.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87134502924 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4575184104 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.561403508772 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9609619825 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 112.824112599 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4285714286 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.419507455431 0.215688989381 194% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.201738466984 0.103423049105 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0961330303487 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.289121380308 0.15604864568 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0635412412185 0.0819641961636 78% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.