In many countries, people are now living longer than ever before. Some people say an ageing creates problems for government. Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people. To what extend do the advantages of having an ageing population outweigh the disadvantages ?
In contemporary society, individuals are experiencing longer lifespans than ever before. This phenomenon has ignited polarized two opinions: While some argue that an ageing population poses challenges for governments, others believe that having more elderly individuals in society can be advantageous. However, I contend that although there are certain benefits to an ageing population, its drawbacks are far greater.
On the positive side, older individuals can bring valuable contributions to the workforce, particularly in terms of diversity. Their wealth of experience and unique perspective can enhance innovation and problem-solving within organizations. For instance, in Japan, a nation noted for its high life expectancy where the elderly often function as community advisors. They offer wisdom on a broad array of issues, from resolving personal disputes to planning local events. Moreover, elderly people often play a vital role in providing care and support for their grandchildren, easing the burden on working parents and promoting familial bonds.
However, the disadvantages of an ageing population are far more significant. One major concern is addressing the financial implications that an ageing population purportedly places on governmental resources. Concerns often revolve around the rising costs of healthcare, pensions, and specialized social services, seen as strains that could divert funds from other critical sectors such as education or infrastructure. Additionally, the shrinking workforce resulting from an ageing population can take a heavy toll on productivity and economic growth. For instance, in several European countries facing demographic challenges, the dependency ratio, which measures the number of non-working individuals compared to the working population, has been steadily increasing. This can give rise to a reduction in tax revenues and a rise in pension and healthcare expenses, causing significant concerns for policymakers in these nations.
In conclusion, while older individuals can foster workplace diversity, I strongly believe that the burden they place on healthcare systems greatly outweighs this advantage because the need to allocate substantial funds to meet the growing heathcare demands of an ageing population can have detrimental effects on other vital areas of society
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-26 | tran quynh | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-26 | tran quynh | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-21 | tran quynh | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The most important aim of science should be to improve people s lives To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Nowadays a growing number of people with health problems are trying alternative medicines and treatments instead of visiting their usual doctor Do you think this is a positive or a negative development 56
- The maps below show an industrial area in the town of Norbiton and planned future development of the site Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s advantage because the need to allocate substantial funds to meet the growing he...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 336.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95833333333 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28139028586 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20368069747 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 214.0 176.041082164 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636904761905 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 630.9 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.630074407 49.4020404114 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.466666667 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232279289447 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0692319404377 0.084324248473 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0539754118951 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133141925967 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559093179984 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 50.2224549098 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.58 12.4159519038 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.58950901804 130% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 78.4519038076 175% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.