The chart below gives information about how families their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018. Summarise the information by make comparisons in one country spent selecting and reporting the main features, and where relevant.
The bar chart compares the percentage of average weekly income spending by families in a certain country in two different years 1968 and 2018.
It is clear that there were significant changes in how people spent their income on different needs. While families spent a lot of money on food in the past, people tend to pay for housing and leisure activities these days.
In 1968, 35% of weekly income was spent on food, 10% for housing and clothing/footware, all other needs such as fuel and power, household goods, personal goods, transport and leisure were under 10%.
In 2018, a different trend can be seen in the distribution of money of families. We can see that the money spent on food was just at 17%, considerable increases in percentage of income spent on housing and leisure can be seen, at 19% and 22% respectively. Another need that also increased dramatically was transport with 14% of weekly income of families.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-28 | Daniel3003 | 73 | view |
- In their advertising businesses nowadays usually emphasise that their products are new in some way Why is this Do you think it is a positive or negative development 61
- The graph below shows the number of shops that closed and the number of new shops that opened in one country between 2011 and 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table below gives information about the problems faced by children in two primary schools in 2005 and 2015 73
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in What are the reasons for this How can people research this 84
- The tables below give information about sales of Fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 770.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 159.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8427672956 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55098862472 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77018145694 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.591194968553 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9816284341 43.030603864 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.0 112.824112599 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176182637447 0.215688989381 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882302874134 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0565591000578 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118780316912 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0533651671581 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 40.7170731707 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.