Some say that it would be better if the majority of employees worked from home instead of travelling to a work place every day. Do you think the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages?
Some people agree that remote work from home is more efficient for most employees rather than commuting to work. Undoubtedly, there are both pros and cons regarding this situation, which I will speak about in this essay.
For me, the advantages of working from home outweigh the disadvantages. Firstly, many workers prefer home working, saying they function more effectively because they can relax and comfortable without the pressure and waste of the long commute. With new technologies placing people in the same room metaphorically, it is becoming much easier to do this. Besides, I think with less travel there is a smaller carbon footprint. For example, driving a car is a major source of greenhouse gasses. So, cutting down on the miles we drive is one of the best things we can do for reducing carbon emissions. Finally, what clinches the argument for me is the fact that working at home enables may people to join the workforce who would not otherwise be able to do so. This option is particularly liberating for women because thay often have more caring responsibilities.
Nonetheless, remote work can cause negative working results as well. For instance, it is more difficult for some people to concentrate on work being at home, as there is a bunch of distractions that can catch their attention. This may lead to a productivity fall and cause some financial losses for the employer.
In conclusion, I believe strongly that working from home is the most fairest and efficient option for people nowadays.
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The bar chart below shows the percentage of unemployed graduates aged 20 24 in one European country over a two year period Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making com 78
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Many people assume that the goal of every country should be to produce more materials and goods To what extend do you agree or disagree that constantly increasing production is an appropriate goal 70
- Modern technology has made it easier for individuals to download copyrighted music and books from the internet for no charge To what extent is this a positive or negative development 70
- Meat production requires relatively more land than crop production Some people think that as land is becoming scarce the world s meat consumption should be reduced What measures could be taken to reduce the world s meat consumption What kinds of problem m 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'fairest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: fairest
... strongly that working from home is the most fairest and efficient option for people nowaday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00790513834 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84921298856 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3616546352 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324414346142 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119590408503 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116991611262 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212153683179 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014735288278 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 65, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'fairest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: fairest
... strongly that working from home is the most fairest and efficient option for people nowaday...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, finally, first, firstly, if, may, nonetheless, regarding, so, well, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1267.0 1615.20841683 78% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.00790513834 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84921298856 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 176.041082164 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612648221344 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 392.4 506.74238477 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.3616546352 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.324414346142 0.244688304435 133% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119590408503 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116991611262 0.0667982634062 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212153683179 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.014735288278 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.