5. It has been suggested that all young adults should be required to undertake unpaid work helping people in the community. Would the drawbacks of such a requirement be greater than the benefits to the community and the individual young adults?
In contemporary society, a mandate to perform an unpaid community service is a heated debate nowadays. while this approach has enormous benefits, it has some adverse affects as well on an individual as well as on the society. The essay shall discuss both perspectives in detail to evaluate the potential impact.
Predominantly, the intent for implementing free-of-charge society service is to inculcate empathy in young people towards the community. This certainly has a lot of merits such as attachment to community people, understanding of issues and exploring resolutions. Similarly, by actively participating in such activities, individuals can develop crucial life skills such as team leadership, communication skills and teamwork.
On the contrary, there are some disadvantages if the proposal is implemented as mandatory. The young generation is already over-occupied with their academic and career-related challenges. They would perceive this activity as an additional burden and would carry it out unwillingly. Resultantly, the desired outcome will not be achieved. Rather there would be resentment and counterproductive behavior.
Furthermore, implementing this idea as an essential requirement is a violation of one's fundamental freedom of opting for an activity. Owing enforcement by the authorities would lead to negative performance and irritable behaviors by the individuals.
In conclusion, the importance of participating in society services cannot be overlooked. However, imposing forcefully shall have more adverse effects than positives. A striking balanced approach of implementing it voluntarily is rational. Individuals will willingly opt for the activity and dedicatedly participate without hurting their liberty or routine schedule. By evaluating both schools of thought I can certainly say that the advantages outweigh the disadvantages as it contributes to the community's betterment and has a strong humanitarian angle involved which should remain a pivotal part of any individual’s life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-02 | Amna Zeeshan | 61 | view |
- 3 Some people think mobile cell phones should be banned in public places such as libraries shops and public transport To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Countries around the world will be facing significant challenges relating not only to the environment but population and education as well What problems will your country face in the next ten years How can th 89
- These days more and more people move away from the area where they were born and brought up when they become adults Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Percentage of UK people who consumed daily recommended amount of fruit and vegetable in 2002 2006 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ty service is a heated debate nowadays. while this approach has enormous benefits, it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e desired outcome will not be achieved. Rather there would be resentment and counterpr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95532646048 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54605541973 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0010973803 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2777777778 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18655051181 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480908870359 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319640419589 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896407722637 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312626174174 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 104, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...ty service is a heated debate nowadays. while this approach has enormous benefits, it...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
...e desired outcome will not be achieved. Rather there would be resentment and counterpr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, however, if, look, similarly, so, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.95532646048 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.54605541973 2.80592935109 126% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632302405498 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0010973803 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.2777777778 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1666666667 20.7667163134 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.44444444444 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18655051181 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0480908870359 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0319640419589 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0896407722637 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312626174174 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.99 12.4159519038 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.83 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 78.4519038076 150% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.