The charts below show the protein and calorie intakes of people in different parts of the world.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar charts illustrate the differences in intaking of the protein and calories of citizens from four regions in the world. Overall, people from North America consume these two categories the most, while the figures for India are opposite. Additionally, the protein figure is reported with two different types, which are animal protein and other types of proteins.
Looking deeper to the charts, there is no much difference in the intaking of the protein in both India and East Africa, at about 15 units for other protein in both areas and about 13 units for animal protein in India and 16 units in East Africa. In relation to the avarage calories intake, 2000 calories is reported in India and roughly 2400 calories is observed in East Africa.
Turning to Latin America, there are 45 units of the protein recorded, in which 32 units are from the animal and 13 units from other sources. Moreover, people in this region consume calories more than two previous nations and nearly reach the ideal intake of this category (2800 calories). North America, on the other hand, is the only region that digests these two chemical elements over the ideal levels, reaching nearly 4600 calories and 80 units of protein. Noted that, in those 80 units, animal type makes up 62 units, making it the most consumed category compared to the other three parts of the world.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-26 | hungdung2507 | view | |
| 2022-08-25 | hungdung2507 | view | |
| 2022-08-25 | hungdung2507 | view |
- The table below shows population figures for four countries for 2003 and the projected figure for 2025 and 2050 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The illustrations below show how coffee is sometimes produced Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and making comparisons where relevant 11
- The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their weekly income in 1968 and in 2018 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the average monthly change in the prices of three metals during 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The graph below shows the number of enquiries received by the Tourist Information Office in one city over six months in 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Looking deeper to the charts, there is no much difference in the intaking of the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84549356223 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26858849615 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510729613734 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8071383307 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199216206801 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947334045408 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059969775918 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147043877696 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040163264765 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 40, Rule ID: NOW[2]
Message: Did you mean 'now' (=at this moment) instead of 'no' (negation)?
Suggestion: now
... Looking deeper to the charts, there is no much difference in the intaking of the ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, moreover, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1129.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 233.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84549356223 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.26858849615 2.65546596893 85% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.510729613734 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 357.3 283.868780488 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8071383307 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.444444444 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.33333333333 5.23603664747 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199216206801 0.215688989381 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947334045408 0.103423049105 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059969775918 0.0843802449381 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147043877696 0.15604864568 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.040163264765 0.0819641961636 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.2329268293 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 40.7170731707 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.