Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus. Do you think this is a positive or negative development?
It is believed that online classes have been suggested to alter traditional ones at many universities. In my opinion, despite some drawbacks, this also have positive impacts on higher education to improve educational quality.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that learning directly plays a crucial role in educating learners. Initially, on-campus courses provide students more networking opportunities. By providing chances to interact and build relationships with peers and professors, they can gain a great deal of experience, which is valuable for career development. In contrast, due to lacking of face-to-face interactions of traditional classes, online learning can be isolating that affects students’ engagement and motivation. For example, while in traditional classrooms, students can engage in discussions, group projects, and social activities, fostering a sense of community, online ones are opposite. A study of University of Melbourne indicated that students in online classes frequently miss the spontaneous conservations and social bonding that occur in physical classrooms due to lacking of interactions on discussion boards or occasional video calls, leads to feeling less personal.
On the other hand, despite some negative potential, the advantage of engaging in a course through digital devices can bring a number of abilities. First, students can arrange their schedule properly due to its flexibility and convenience. Online classes allow them to study at their own pace and one their own schedule, which is beneficial for working professionals, parents, or those with other commitments. With internet connecting, learners can assess many materials from a lot of sources makes it easier for those who live far away from campus or have mobility issues to pursue higher education. Furthermore, online courses offer cost-effectiveness, less expenses. If in-person courses requires more campus-related expenses, the online ones are less, referring to commuting, houses, and so on. Which I mean, in some universities, they only offer lower tuition rates for online courses.
In conclusion, despite some disadvantages related to interactions, I believe that the various benefits in terms of accessibility, flexibility, and cost-effectiveness make online learning a positive development in current life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-07 | nhimdzaivahocgioiielts8. | 95 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | Kiwi | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-21 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 81 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | curella.com | 89 | view |
- SOME PEOPLE BELIEVE THAT STUDYING AT UNIVERSITY OR COLLEGE IS THE BEST ROUTE TO A SUCCESSFUL CAREER WHILE OTHERS BELIEVE THAT IT IS BETTER TO GET A JOB STRAIGHT AFTER SCHOOL DISCUSS BOTH VIEWS AND GIVE YOUR OPINION 87
- Some universities offer online courses as an alternative to classes delivered on campus Do you think this is a positive or negative development 95
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 805, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... to commuting, houses, and so on. Which I mean, in some universities, they only o...
^
Line 7, column 68, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... disadvantages related to interactions, I believe that the various benefits in te...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, so, while, for example, i mean, in conclusion, in contrast, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.84750733138 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.353654201 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 634.5 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 4.76152304609 252% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.1275642203 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.625 106.682146367 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3125 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20483652356 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666122861127 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0468335213902 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121952212269 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0315423008001 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 130.0 78.4519038076 166% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.