The table below shows information about age, average income per person and population below poverty line in three states in the USA. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting and make comparisons where relevant.
The provided table outlines age demographics, average income per capita, and poverty rates across three states in the USA. Here's an improved version of the report:
Overall, California shows the highest average income per person, followed by Florida and Utah. In terms of poverty rates, Utah has the lowest percentage of residents living below the poverty line, while California and Florida have higher rates.
In California, 16% of the population falls below the poverty line, with 17% aged under 18 and 13% aged over 60. Comparatively, Florida has a slightly lower poverty rate of 12%, with 16% under 18 and 23% over 60. Notably, California's average income per person stands at $23,000, which is $1,000 more than Florida's.
Utah, with a poverty rate of 9%, exhibits a higher proportion of younger residents (28%) compared to those over 60 (8%). However, the average income in Utah is notably lower than both California and Florida, at $16,000 and $18,000 respectively.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities 67
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some argue that music mainly serves as a way for individuals to reduce their stress and anxiety To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The flow chart below shows the procedure to get a driving license in US Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below illustrates how two types of tea including Pu erh and ripe tea are manufactured 84
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2