Some people think that countries should produce food their population eats and import less food as much as possible. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
There is a prevalent notion that the supreme authority of several regions should create some policy to prioritize producing for their population and limit purchasing stuff from abroad. Personally, I totally do not concur with that statement and I will give my own opinion in this essay.
It is understandable why countries should be encouraged to produce food domestically and alleviate reliance on food import. To begin with, in terms of budget, it will enable countries to allocate less budget on importing refreshments from other regions, which can cost a huge amount of money and time on account of the long delivery route between continents such as Asia and Europe. Additionally, there is another noticeable point that before being officially consumed widely, it must be examined meticulously to detect abnormalities in food, which can take a long time to meet the demands of food security. Moreover, producing food self-sufficiency also improves food safety because it is planted and taken care of carefully under the supervision of the experts that are nominated by the government to ensure health of their citizens. In other words, inhabitants are the significant factor that contribute to the enhancement of the countries, so the health is always considered as the top priority of any regions.
However, I believe that this perspective is not just achievable in many countries. First, the territory and natural condition of each country is different and not appropriate for several kind of food crops and fruit trees because if the farmer still attempts to plant these kinds of plants, it may lead to several risky consequences that can affect to people’s health and cause economic loss. Taking Somalia as an instance of this issue, this region faces recurring droughts, inconsistent rainfall and extreme temperatures which hinder agricultural productivity, so Somalia imports a significant portion of its food including grains, sugar and vegetables oil. On the other hand, the land for constructing residential areas and recreational amenities will be given over for agricultural purposes which leads to the deficiency of accommodation and increase the number of homeless people.
In conclusion, the countries should pay more attention to refreshment majors and improve the quality of these products to provide the citizens with well-qualified and safe production. Besides, the government of the countries had better import some deficient food that cannot be planted in their regions in order to develop the inter-continental relationship.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-06-29 | nobitaa | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 89 | view |
| 2024-01-09 | nguyenkhangtriem | 84 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Chinkiarora | 71 | view |
- Some groups of people have benefited from modern communication technology However some think they do not have any benefit from this To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The diagram below shows the development of cutting tools in the Stone Age Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The line graph shows the percentages of Australian export with four countries The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1990 to 2012 You should write at least 150 words 84
- Some people think that governments should provide Internet access at no charge Others however argue that people should pay for this service Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The graph below shows the percentage of the Australian workforce in five industries between 1962 and 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 198, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...rchasing stuff from abroad. Personally, I totally do not concur with that stateme...
^
Line 1, column 246, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...y do not concur with that statement and I will give my own opinion in this essay....
^
Line 3, column 10, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... top priority of any regions. However, I believe that this perspective is not ju...
^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun kind seems to be countable; consider using: 'several kinds'.
Suggestion: several kinds
...ry is different and not appropriate for several kind of food crops and fruit trees because i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, well, in conclusion, kind of, such as, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 398.0 315.596192385 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42462311558 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46653527281 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1077273844 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 678.6 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 20.2975951904 148% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.8597761186 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 166.076923077 106.682146367 156% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.6153846154 20.7667163134 147% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7692307692 7.06120827912 167% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245179612702 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0829031561122 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.077308094671 0.0667982634062 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140951104326 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496558607368 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.57 50.2224549098 65% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 11.3001002004 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.75 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 124.0 78.4519038076 158% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 10.1190380762 138% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.