The graph below shows the average growth in domestic products in wealthy countries, countries that have adopted a global approach to business in countries that have not.
Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below.
The bar chart delineates the average GDP expansion annually of three types of countries from the 1960s to the 1990s. The average gross domestic products of wealthy countries, globalisers and non-globalisers changed noticeably during the periods.
Specifically, in 1960s, the GDP growth of wealthy countries was the highest statistic compared to other counterparts, with almost 5%. In contrast, globalisers had the low performance with the lowest statistic with just over 1%. However, after three decades, countries with the adoption of global approach had proven the effectiveness of such an approach. The figure for globalisers surged from 1.2% to just under 3% in the 1970s, and continued to rise in the next decade by 3.1%. Finally, the statistic of the performance of globalisers skyrocketed to 5% in the last 10 years. Opposing to that, wealthy countries witnessed a downward trend, with the first significant drop to 2.9% between the 1960s and 1970s. The figure for wealthy countries continued to decrease every 10 years, until the proportion was recorded as 2% in the 1990s.
The final figure, non-globalisers, fluctuated during the descriptive period. Standing at the second place in the 1960s, with 2.2%, the average performance of non-globalisers improved by 1% in the 1970s, before experiencing a dramatic fall in 1980s (0.8%). Although that of non-globaliser later increased again in the 1990s, the figure has lost its place and became the lowest figure with 1.2%.
In general, the annual GDP growth of each type of country alternated differently in 30 years. While wealthy countries and countries who did not follow a global method in business show a downward trend, the other data was recognized with a upward trend.
- The graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport 73
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use 78
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 89
- People generally know that the environment is important. However, most individuals still don't take responsibility to protect the environment. Why is this? What should be done to encourage people to protect the environment 84
- International travel is becoming cheaper, and countries are opening their doors to more and more tourists. Do the advantages of increased tourism outweigh its disadvantages 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 237, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...end, the other data was recognized with a upward trend.
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, second, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 33.7804878049 160% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 965.302439024 151% => OK
No of words: 276.0 196.424390244 141% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28260869565 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07593519647 3.73543355544 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00618105803 2.65546596893 113% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 106.607317073 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54347826087 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 407.7 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.33902439024 254% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 3.36585365854 267% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 8.94146341463 157% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.672187762 43.030603864 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.142857143 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7142857143 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.78571428571 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.220654619985 0.215688989381 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0802211721708 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0692938043815 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143208868469 0.15604864568 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0822150579806 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 40.7170731707 160% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.